Cited by 11Electric Motor Design and AnalysisMagnetic Properties of AlloysMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimization of rotation patterns of a mangle-type magnetic field source using covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy

Sakuma, Hiroshi, Nakagawara, Takuto·2021·Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.167752

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Mallinson, 1973, One-sided fluxes—a magnetic curiosity?, IEEE Trans. Magn., 9, 678, 10.1109/TMAG.1973.1067714 · DOI
  2. Cugat, 1994, Permanent magnet variable flux sources, IEEE Trans. Magn., 30, 4602, 10.1109/20.334162 · DOI
  3. Coey, 2002, Permanent magnet applications, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 248, 441, 10.1016/S0304-8853(02)00335-9 · DOI
  4. Bjørk, 2010, Comparison of adjustable permanent magnetic field sources, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 322, 3664, 10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.07.022 · DOI
  5. Hilton, 2012, An adjustable linear Halbach array, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 324, 2051, 10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.02.014 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Sakuma, 2020, Generation of 2D Vector Magnetic Field by Mangle-Type Magnetic Field Source Using Permanent Magnets, J. Magn. Soc. Jpn., 44, 21, 10.3379/msjmag.2001R004 · DOI
  7. Hansen, 2001, Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies: Evol, Comput., 9, 159
  8. A. V. Grayver, A. V. Kuvshinov, Exploring equivalence domain in nonlinear inverse problems using Covariance Matrix Adaption Evolution Strategy (CMAES) and random sampling, Geophys. J. Int. 205 (2016) 971–987. 10.1093/gji/ggw063. · DOI
  9. Li, 2017, Analysis and design of electrical machines with material uncertainties in iron and permanent magnet, COMPEL, 36, 1326, 10.1108/COMPEL-02-2017-0110 · DOI
  10. J. Lucas, P. Lucas, T. L. Mercier, A. Rollat, W. G. Davenport, Rare Earths: Science, Technology, Production and Use, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2014. · DOI
  11. N. Hansen, The CMA evolution strategy: a tutorial, arXiv: 1604.00772 (2016). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sakuma, H., & Nakagawara, T.
Affiliations
Utsunomiya University (JP)
Corresponding author
Sakuma, Hiroshi
Venue
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
527
Pages
167752
ISSN
0304-8853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121669491
Cited by
11
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Motor Design and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Magnetic Properties of Alloys
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Keywords
permanent magnets, magnetic field homogeneity, CMA-ES, Halbach array

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review