Cited by 113Carbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesSupercapacitor Materials and FabricationCovalent Organic Framework Applications

Binary doping of nitrogen and phosphorus into porous carbon: A novel di-functional material for enhancing CO2 capture and super-capacitance

Wang, Yuan, Xiao, Jianfei, Wang, Hanzhi, Zhang, Tian C., Yuan, Shaojun·2022·Journal of Materials Science & Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.05.035

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Y., Xiao, J., Wang, H., Zhang, T. C., & Yuan, S.
Affiliations
  • Sichuan University (CN)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Yuan, Shaojun
Venue
Journal of Materials Science & Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
99
Pages
73-81
ISSN
1005-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3183981393
Cited by
113
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 7
FWCI
8.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Material Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Covalent Organic Framework Applications
Keywords
nitrogen and phosphorus co-doped carbon, porous carbon, CO2 adsorption, supercapacitors, hierarchical porosity, heteroatom doping, carbon electrodes, specific capacitance, adsorbents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review