Cited by 168Reliability and Maintenance OptimizationManagement and Optimization TechniquesDigital Transformation in Industry

Industrial maintenance decision-making: A systematic literature review

Ruschel, Edson, Santos, Eduardo Alves Portela, Loures, Eduardo de Freitas Rocha·2017·Journal of Manufacturing Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.09.003

Cites

163 of 163 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ruschel, E., Santos, E. A. P., & Loures, E. D. F. R.
Affiliations
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (BR)
Corresponding author
Ruschel, Edson
Venue
Journal of Manufacturing Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
45
Pages
180-194
ISSN
0278-6125 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2760655021
Cited by
168
References
163
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Manufacturing Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
Keywords
industrial maintenance, maintenance decision-making, decision support system, maintenance optimization, predictive maintenance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review