Cited by 183Digital Transformation in IndustryFault Detection and Control SystemsIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

Digital Twin-driven Online Anomaly Detection for an Automation System Based on Edge Intelligence

Huang, Huiyue, Yang, Lei, Wang, Yuanbin, Xu, Xun, Lu, Yuqian·2021·Journal of Manufacturing Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.02.010

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, H., Yang, L., Wang, Y., Xu, X., & Lu, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • State Key Laboratory Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Yuanbin
  • Lu, Yuqian
Venue
Journal of Manufacturing Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
59
Pages
138-150
ISSN
0278-6125 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3134116407
Cited by
183
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 12
FWCI
15.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Manufacturing Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
China Scholarship Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
digital twin, online anomaly detection, edge AI, edge computing, industrial automation systems, real-time health monitoring, anomaly prediction, edge-cloud networks, proactive maintenance, fault detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review