Cited by 602Financial Risk and Volatility ModelingStatistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsStatistical Methods and Inference

Asymptotic efficiency of the two-stage estimation method for copula-based models

Open access
Joe, Harry·2005·Journal of Multivariate Analysis

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmva.2004.06.003

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In copula regression applications, it is common to use the inference for margins (IFM) procedure.

    “In copula regression applications, it is common to use the inference for margins (IFM) procedure, a two stage estimation algorithm due to Joe (2005).”

    From Dependence modeling of multivariate longitudinal hybrid insurance data with dropout (2021) · cites this paper as Joe (2005)

    Section 2 identifies IFM as a two-stage method for copula-based multivariate models and says it can be used with covariates. It does not establish that IFM is common specifically in copula regression applications. It also says the method was used before 2005 and credits its general formulation to Xu and an earlier work by Joe, rather than originating in this paper. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joe, H.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Joe, Harry
Venue
Journal of Multivariate Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
94
Issue
2
Pages
401-419
ISSN
0047-259X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972882514
Cited by
602
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 22
FWCI
11.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Multivariate Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
Keywords
two-stage estimation, asymptotic relative efficiency, maximum likelihood estimation, asymptotic covariance matrix, dependence parameter, bivariate extreme value distribution, multivariate dependence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review