Journey to confidence: women's experiences of pain in labour and relational continuity of care
Abstract
Introduction An evaluation carried out at King's College Hospital Foundation National Health Service Trust in London identified that women who received continuity of carer from the Albany Midwifery Practice were significantly less likely to use pharmacological pain relief when comparisons were made with eight other midwifery group practices and the local maternity service as a whole. This study was designed to explore women's views of this phenomenon. Methods We conducted a thematic analysis of semistructured, audiotaped, in-depth interviews with 10 women who reflected on their experiences of preparation and support for pain in labour and midwifery continuity of carer with Albany midwives, using a qualitative descriptive methodological approach. Results Women reflected positively on how, throughout pregnancy and labour, their midwives promoted a sense of their ability to cope with the challenge of labour pain. This building of confidence was enabled through a relationship of trust that developed with their midwives and the value of hearing other women's stories during antenatal groups. These experiences enhanced women's ability to overcome fears and self-doubt about coping with pain and led to feelings of pride, elation, and empowerment after birth. Discussion Women valued being encouraged and supported to labour without using pharmacological pain relief by midwives with whom they developed a trusting relationship throughout pregnancy. Features of midwifery approaches to pain…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women tend to trust the expertise and advice of the midwife when there is continuity in the relationship.
“Women tend to trust the expertise and advice of the midwife when there is continuity in the relationship (Leap et al., 2010).”
From Women's experiences of home visits by midwives in the early postnatal period (2016) · cites this paper as Leap et al., 2010
Cites
Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: A systematic review
Hodnett, E. D. (2002) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(02)70189-0 · Cited by 967 · see citing works
Huber, U. S., & Sandall, J. (2009) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2007.10.011 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationA randomised study of midwifery caseload care and traditional ‘shared-care’
(2000) · Midwifery · doi:10.1054/midw.2000.0224 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Women’s psychological experiences of physiological childbirth: a meta-synthesis
Olza, I., Leahy-Warren, P., Benyamini, Y., Kazmierczak, M., Karlsdottir, S. I., Spyridou, A., Crespo-Mirasol, E., Takács, L., Hall, P. J., Murphy, M., et al. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020347 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
What women value in the midwifery continuity of care model: a systematic review with meta-synthesis
Perriman, N., Davis, D. L., & Ferguson, S. (2018) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2018.04.011 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Taheri, M., Takian, A., Taghizadeh, Z., Jafari, N., & Sarafraz, N. (2018) · Reproductive Health · doi:10.1186/s12978-018-0511-x · Cited by 253 · see citing works
The woman’s birth experience---the effect of interpersonal relationships and continuity of care
Dahlberg, U., & Aune, I. (2013) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2012.09.006 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
McLachlan, H., Forster, D., Davey, M., Farrell, T., Flood, M., Shafiei, T., & Waldenström, U. (2016) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13713 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Women׳s experiences of coping with pain during childbirth: A critical review of qualitative research
Van der Gucht, N., & Lewis, K. (2015) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2014.12.005 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Women's experiences of home visits by midwives in the early postnatal period
Dahlberg, U., Haugan, G., & Aune, I. (2016) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2016.05.003 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Allen, J., Kildea, S., Hartz, D. L., Tracy, M., & Tracy, S. (2017) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2017.03.012 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Women's experiences of having a Bachelor of Midwifery student provide continuity of care
Tickle, N., Sidebotham, M., Fenwick, J., & Gamble, J. (2016) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2015.11.002 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Aune, I., Dahlberg, U., Backe, B., & Haugan, G. (2013) · Nordic Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/010740831303300304 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Leap, N., Sandall, J., Buckland, S., & Huber, U.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Leap, Nicky
- ORCID
- Sandall, Jane
- Venue
- Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-05-06
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 234-242
- ISSN
- 1526-9523 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-2011
- OpenAlex
- W2159222359
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 12.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
- Keywords
- labor pain, continuity of midwifery care, women's experiences, midwife-patient relationship, trust, self-confidence, pharmacological pain management, normal birth, empowerment, childbirth preparation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Analgesics, Continuity of Patient Care, Female, Home Childbirth, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Midwifery, Mothers, Natural Childbirth, Nurse-Patient Relations, Power, Psychological, Pregnancy, Patient Satisfaction, Trust, Labor Pain, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review