Cited by 196Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsAnesthesia and Pain ManagementPregnancy-related medical research

Journey to confidence: women's experiences of pain in labour and relational continuity of care

Leap, Nicky, Sandall, Jane, Buckland, Sara, Huber, Ulli·2010·Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health

Abstract

Introduction An evaluation carried out at King's College Hospital Foundation National Health Service Trust in London identified that women who received continuity of carer from the Albany Midwifery Practice were significantly less likely to use pharmacological pain relief when comparisons were made with eight other midwifery group practices and the local maternity service as a whole. This study was designed to explore women's views of this phenomenon. Methods We conducted a thematic analysis of semistructured, audiotaped, in-depth interviews with 10 women who reflected on their experiences of preparation and support for pain in labour and midwifery continuity of carer with Albany midwives, using a qualitative descriptive methodological approach. Results Women reflected positively on how, throughout pregnancy and labour, their midwives promoted a sense of their ability to cope with the challenge of labour pain. This building of confidence was enabled through a relationship of trust that developed with their midwives and the value of hearing other women's stories during antenatal groups. These experiences enhanced women's ability to overcome fears and self-doubt about coping with pain and led to feelings of pride, elation, and empowerment after birth. Discussion Women valued being encouraged and supported to labour without using pharmacological pain relief by midwives with whom they developed a trusting relationship throughout pregnancy. Features of midwifery approaches to pain…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmwh.2010.02.001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women tend to trust the expertise and advice of the midwife when there is continuity in the relationship.

    “Women tend to trust the expertise and advice of the midwife when there is continuity in the relationship (Leap et al., 2010).”

    From Women's experiences of home visits by midwives in the early postnatal period (2016) · cites this paper as Leap et al., 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leap, N., Sandall, J., Buckland, S., & Huber, U.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Leap, Nicky
Venue
Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05-06
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
234-242
ISSN
  • 1526-9523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-2011
OpenAlex
W2159222359
Cited by
196
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 6
FWCI
12.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
labor pain, continuity of midwifery care, women's experiences, midwife-patient relationship, trust, self-confidence, pharmacological pain management, normal birth, empowerment, childbirth preparation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analgesics, Continuity of Patient Care, Female, Home Childbirth, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Midwifery, Mothers, Natural Childbirth, Nurse-Patient Relations, Power, Psychological, Pregnancy, Patient Satisfaction, Trust, Labor Pain, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review