Cited by 425Network Security and Intrusion DetectionCloud Data Security SolutionsNetwork Packet Processing and Optimization

An intrusion detection and prevention system in cloud computing: A systematic review

Patel, Ahmed, Taghavi, Mona, Bakhtiyari, Kaveh, Celestino Júnior, Joaquim·2013·Journal of Network and Computer Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jnca.2012.08.007

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patel, A., Taghavi, M., Bakhtiyari, K., & Celestino Júnior, J.
Affiliations
  • Kingston University London (GB)
  • National University of Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Taghavi, Mona
Venue
Journal of Network and Computer Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
25-41
ISSN
1084-8045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139836766
Cited by
425
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 17
FWCI
9.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Network and Computer Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Network Packet Processing and Optimization
Keywords
intrusion detection and prevention systems, cloud security, alarm management, ontology (information science), risk management, fuzzy set theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review