Efficient location privacy algorithm for Internet of Things (IoT) services and applications
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sensor data can lead to unexpected inferences about individuals and their behavior.
“Several studies [9, 12, 40] have recently highlighted how sensor data can lead to unexpected inferences about individuals and their behavior.”
From IoT Expunge: Implementing Verifiable Retention of IoT Data (2020) · cites this paper as [40]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Current research on Internet of Things (IoT) security: A survey
Mohamad Noor, M. B., & Hassan, W. H. (2019) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2018.11.025 · Cited by 989 · see citing works
Review of Security and Privacy for the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
Hatzivasilis, G., Soultatos, O., Ioannidis, S., Verikoukis, C., Demetriou, G., & Tsatsoulis, C. (2019) · 2019 15th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS) · doi:10.1109/dcoss.2019.00091 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Privacy-Preservation Techniques for IoT Devices: A Systematic Mapping Study
Torre, D., Chennamaneni, A., & Rodriguez, A. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3245524 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
IoT Expunge: Implementing Verifiable Retention of IoT Data
Panwar, N., Sharma, S., Gupta, P., Ghosh, D., Mehrotra, S., & Venkatasubramanian, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy · doi:10.1145/3374664.3375737 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Examples of such a use-case scenario can be a cellular provider outsourcing customers’ connectivity data to cell towers (from which their approximate location can be determined) to the cloud and providing such information to service providers (via the cloud) that build location-based services [40] based on such data.”
Background
- Authors
- Sun, G., Chang, V., Ramachandran, M., Sun, Z., Li, G., Yu, H., & Liao, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN)
- Leeds Beckett University (GB)
- University of Surrey (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Liao, Dan
- Venue
- Journal of Network and Computer Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 89
- Pages
- 3-13
- ISSN
- 1084-8045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2537158000
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 18.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Journal of Network and Computer Applications (publishedVersion)
- Leeds Beckett Repository (Leeds Beckett University) (submittedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- TeesRep (Teesside University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Teesside University Research Portal (Teesside University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Natural Science Foundation of China (61571098)
- China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M570778)
- Guangdong Science and Technology Foundation (2013A040600001, 2013B090200004, 2014B090901007, 2015A040404001, 2013B040300001)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
- Keywords
- location privacy, location-based services, Internet of Things, privacy-preserving location tracking, malicious server attacks, privacy-preserving computation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
