Cited by 172Internet of Things and AIIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingInformation and Cyber Security

Review of Security and Privacy for the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)

Hatzivasilis, George, Soultatos, Othonas, Ioannidis, Sotiris, Verikoukis, Christos, Demetriou, Giorgos, Tsatsoulis, Christos·2019·2019 15th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS)

Abstract

Day-by-day modern circular economy (CE) models gain ground and penetrate the traditional business sectors. The Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) is the main enabler for this interplay of CE with healthcare. Novel services, like remote sensing, assisting of elder people, and e-visit, enhance the people's health and convenience, while reducing the per-patient cost for the medical institutions. However, the rise of mobile, wearable, and telemedicine solutions means that security can no longer be examined within the neat, physical walls as it was considered before. The problem for a healthcare system further increases as the Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) reality, affects the way that the health services are accommodated nowadays. Both patients and healthcare staff utilize their personal devices (e.g. smart phones or tablets) in order to access, deliver, and process medical data. As the IoMT is materialized and the underlying devices maintain so valuable data, they become a popular target for ransomware and other attacks. In the CE case, the problem is further emerging as several of these assets can be used over-and-over by many actuators. However, medical users and vendors are less aware of the underlying vulnerabilities and spend less on the IoMT security. Nevertheless, the risk from exploiting vulnerabilities can be drastically reduced when the known and relevant controls are placed. This paper presents an overview of the core security and privacy controls that must be deployed in modern IoMT settings in order to safeguard the involved users and stakeholders. The overall approach can be considered as a best-practices guide towards the safe implementation of IoMT systems, featuring CE.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/dcoss.2019.00091

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hatzivasilis, G., Soultatos, O., Ioannidis, S., Verikoukis, C., Demetriou, G., & Tsatsoulis, C.
Affiliations
  • Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
  • Centre Tecnologic de Telecomunicacions de Catalunya (ES)
  • École nationale des ponts et chaussées (FR)
  • Nodalpoint Systems
Venue
2019 15th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-05
Pages
457-464
OpenAlex
W2969281952
Cited by
172
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 3
FWCI
16.53
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Distributed Computing in Smart Systems and the Internet of Things (DCOSS-IoT) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords
Internet of Medical Things, IoMT security, privacy, Bring Your Own Device, ransomware, medical device vulnerabilities, security countermeasures, circular economy, telemedicine, wearable devices, healthcare data protection, best practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review