The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep learning methods in network intrusion detection: A survey and an objective comparison
Abstract
Abstract The use of deep learning models for the network intrusion detection task has been an active area of research in cybersecurity. Although several excellent surveys cover the growing body of research on this topic, the literature lacks an objective comparison of the different deep learning models within a controlled environment, especially on recent intrusion detection datasets. In this paper, we first introduce a taxonomy of deep learning models in intrusion detection and summarize the research papers on this topic. Then we train and evaluate four key deep learning models - feed-forward neural network, autoencoder, deep belief network and long short-term memory network - for the intrusion classification task on two legacy datasets (KDD 99, NSL-KDD) and two modern datasets (CIC-IDS2017, CIC-IDS2018). Our results suggest that deep feed-forward neural networks yield desirable evaluation metrics on all four datasets in terms of accuracy, F1-score and training and inference time. The results also indicate that two popular semi-supervised learning models, autoencoders and deep belief networks do not perform better than supervised feed-forward neural networks. The implementation and the complete set of results have been released for future use by the research community. Finally, we discuss the issues in the research literature that were revealed in the survey and suggest several potential future directions for research in machine learning methods for intrusion detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741
Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(1993) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.1993 · Cited by 17,667
Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate
Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.0473 · Cited by 16,213
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.57702/o9raffed · Cited by 14,214
Cited by
Explainable Artificial Intelligence in CyberSecurity: A Survey
Capuano, N., Fenza, G., Loia, V., & Stanzione, C. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3204171 · Cited by 330
“The whole execution of the study is made public in order to facilitate objective comparisons and transparency in [60].”
BackgroundEnhancing intrusion detection with feature selection and neural network
Wu, C., & Li, W. (2021) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/int.22397 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Gamage, S., & Samarabandu, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Network and Computer Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 169
- Pages
- 102767
- ISSN
- 1084-8045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3047132966
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 92
- FWCI
- 23.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep learning methods in network intrusion detection: A survey and an objective comparison. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102767
- The paper
- Gamage, S., & Samarabandu, J. (2020). Deep learning methods in network intrusion detection: A survey and an objective comparison. Journal of Network and Computer Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102767
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.