Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 382

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep learning methods in network intrusion detection: A survey and an objective comparison

Gamage, Sunanda, Samarabandu, Jagath·2020·Journal of Network and Computer Applications

Abstract

Abstract The use of deep learning models for the network intrusion detection task has been an active area of research in cybersecurity. Although several excellent surveys cover the growing body of research on this topic, the literature lacks an objective comparison of the different deep learning models within a controlled environment, especially on recent intrusion detection datasets. In this paper, we first introduce a taxonomy of deep learning models in intrusion detection and summarize the research papers on this topic. Then we train and evaluate four key deep learning models - feed-forward neural network, autoencoder, deep belief network and long short-term memory network - for the intrusion classification task on two legacy datasets (KDD 99, NSL-KDD) and two modern datasets (CIC-IDS2017, CIC-IDS2018). Our results suggest that deep feed-forward neural networks yield desirable evaluation metrics on all four datasets in terms of accuracy, F1-score and training and inference time. The results also indicate that two popular semi-supervised learning models, autoencoders and deep belief networks do not perform better than supervised feed-forward neural networks. The implementation and the complete set of results have been released for future use by the research community. Finally, we discuss the issues in the research literature that were revealed in the survey and suggest several potential future directions for research in machine learning methods for intrusion detection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102767

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 92 references

Cited by

See all 382

Metadata

Authors
Gamage, S., & Samarabandu, J.
Venue
Journal of Network and Computer Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
169
Pages
102767
ISSN
1084-8045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3047132966
Cited by
382
References
92
FWCI
23.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep learning methods in network intrusion detection: A survey and an objective comparison. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102767
The paper
Gamage, S., & Samarabandu, J. (2020). Deep learning methods in network intrusion detection: A survey and an objective comparison. Journal of Network and Computer Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102767

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.