Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate
Open accessAbstract
Neural machine translation is a recently proposed approach to machine translation. Unlike the traditional statistical machine translation, the neural machine translation aims at building a single neural network that can be jointly tuned to maximize the translation performance. The models proposed recently for neural machine translation often belong to a family of encoder-decoders and consists of an encoder that encodes a source sentence into a fixed-length vector from which a decoder generates a translation. In this paper, we conjecture that the use of a fixed-length vector is a bottleneck in improving the performance of this basic encoder-decoder architecture, and propose to extend this by allowing a model to automatically (soft-)search for parts of a source sentence that are relevant to predicting a target word, without having to form these parts as a hard segment explicitly. With this new approach, we achieve a translation performance comparable to the existing state-of-the-art phrase-based system on the task of English-to-French translation. Furthermore, qualitative analysis reveals that the (soft-)alignments found by the model agree well with our intuition.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous versions of attention in machine learning have relied on recurrent processing, and in this way could be considered more similar to biological attention.
“Previous versions of attention in machine learning have relied on recurrent processing, and in this way could be considered more similar to biological attention (Mnih et al. 2014, Bahdanau et al. 2014).”
From Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness (2023) · cites this paper as Bahdanau et al. 2014
Section 3.1 (pp. 3–4) describes this paper’s attention mechanism as using the previous RNN hidden state to score which input annotations to attend to, supporting the recurrent-processing part of the claim. The paper does not compare that mechanism with biological attention or say recurrence makes it more biologically similar. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAttention mechanisms have become an integral part of compelling sequence modeling and transduction models in various tasks, allowing modeling of dependencies without regard to their distance in the input or output sequences.
“Attention mechanisms have become an integral part of compelling sequence modeling and transduction models in various tasks, allowing modeling of dependencies without regard to their distance in the input or output sequences [2, 19].”
From Attention Is All You Need (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
Section 3.1 (pp. 3–4) describes attention that lets each generated word draw on annotations across the source sentence. Section 6.1 (p. 8) says the model computes a weight for every source word for each translated word. The paper does not establish distance-independent modeling of dependencies in output sequences or the broader claim that attention is integral across various tasks; it cautions that its approach may have limited applicability to other tasks. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAdditive attention is computationally more expensive and less parallelizable than dot-product attention.
“The Additive Attention introduced in Bahdanau et al. (2014) is computationally more expensive (matrix operation + nonlinearity) and less parallelizable.”
From Can "consciousness" be observed from large language model (LLM) internal states? Dissecting LLM representations obtained from Theory of Mind test with Integrated Information Theory and Span Representation analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Bahdanau et al. (2014)
Section 3.1 (p. 3) describes the proposed attention mechanism as a feedforward alignment network. Appendix A.1.2 (p. 12) says it must be evaluated for every source–target word pair and discusses reducing its computational cost. The paper does not compare its cost with dot-product attention or say it is less parallelizable. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredRecurrent neural networks, including long short-term memory and gated recurrent networks, are state-of-the-art approaches in sequence modeling and transduction problems such as language modeling and machine translation.
“Recurrent neural networks, long short-term memory [13] and gated recurrent [7] neural networks in particular, have been firmly established as state of the art approaches in sequence modeling and transduction problems such as language modeling and machine translation [35, 2, 5].”
From Attention Is All You Need (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
Section 5.1 (p. 5) reports that the paper’s gated-RNN translation model performed as well as a conventional phrase-based system for sentences containing only known words. The Conclusion (p. 9) calls its translation performance comparable to existing systems, but says further work is needed to match state-of-the-art systems in all contexts. The paper does not establish the broader claim that RNNs, including LSTMs and gated RNNs, were firmly state-of-the-art across sequence modeling and language modeling. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPure model- and data-scaling based on recurrent models will not be enough to match the performance of attention-based architecture.
“This finding is non-surprising given the impact of the attention mechanism on the field of machine translation (Bahdanau et al., 2014), indicating that pure model- and data-scaling based on recurrent models will not be enough to match the performance of attention-based architecture (Rodchenko et al., 2025).”
From MesaNet: Sequence Modeling by Locally Optimal Test-Time Training (2025) · cites this paper as Bahdanau et al., 2014
The second wave was driven by attention mechanisms and sequence-to-sequence models, culminating in foundation models and large language models.
“The second wave was driven by the emergence of attention mechanisms and sequence-to-sequence models [6], culminating in foundation models and large language models [7].”
From The next paradigm in bioinformatics: a review of multi-agent systems and foundational models for end-to-end scientific discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
Bahdanau et al. (2014) introduced the attention mechanism into neural networks to address the challenge of aligning sentences across languages and improve translation quality.
“To address this challenge and improve translation quality, researchers in Bahdanau et al. (2014) introduced the attention mechanism into neural networks.”
From Large language models (LLMs): survey, technical frameworks, and future challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Bahdanau et al. 2014
The attention mechanism enables the network to selectively focus on specific sections of the source text during translation.
“This mechanism enables the network to selectively focus on specific sections of the source text during translation.”
From Large language models (LLMs): survey, technical frameworks, and future challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Bahdanau et al. 2014
Attention can be useful for learning context features related to the target and achieve joint alignment and translation, showing better performance for long sentences.
“Attention can be useful for learning context features related to the target and achieve joint alignment and translation, showing better performance for long sentences.”
From Empowering things with intelligence: a survey of the progress, challenges, and opportunities in artificial intelligence of things (2021) · cites this paper as [173]
Attention mechanism is used to attend to all source words (global attention) or only part of them (local attention) when decoding at each step of RNN [173], [174], [175].
“Later, attention mechanism is used to attend to all source words (i.e., global attention) or only part of them (i.e., local attention) when decoding at each step of RNN [173], [174], [175].”
From Empowering things with intelligence: a survey of the progress, challenges, and opportunities in artificial intelligence of things (2021) · cites this paper as [173]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 16,213
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Axelrod, A., He, X., and Gao, J. (2011). Domain adaptation via pseudo in-domain data selection. In Proceedings of the ACL Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) , pages 355-362. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Bastien, F., Lamblin, P., Pascanu, R., Bergstra, J., Goodfellow, I. J., Bergeron, A., Bouchard, N., and Bengio, Y. (2012). Theano: new features and speed improvements. Deep Learning and Unsupervised Feature Learning NIPS 2012 Workshop.
- Bengio, Y., Simard, P., and Frasconi, P. (1994). Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks , 5 (2), 157-166.
- Bergstra, J., Breuleux, O., Bastien, F., Lamblin, P., Pascanu, R., Desjardins, G., Turian, J., WardeFarley, D., and Bengio, Y. (2010). Theano: a CPU and GPU math expression compiler. In Proceedings of the Python for Scientific Computing Conference (SciPy) . Oral Presentation.
- Cho, K., van Merri¨ enboer, B., Bahdanau, D., and Bengio, Y. (2014b). On the properties of neural machine translation: Encoder-Decoder approaches. In Eighth Workshop on Syntax, Semantics and Structure in Statistical Translation . to appear.
- Devlin, J., Zbib, R., Huang, Z., Lamar, T., Schwartz, R., and Makhoul, J. (2014). Fast and robust neural network joint models for statistical machine translation. In Association for Computational Linguistics .
- Forcada, M. L. and ˜ Neco, R. P. (1997). Recursive hetero-associative memories for translation. In J. Mira, R. Moreno-D´ ıaz, and J. Cabestany, editors, Biological and Artificial Computation: From Neuroscience to Technology , volume 1240 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science , pages 453-462. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
- Goodfellow, I., Warde-Farley, D., Mirza, M., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y. (2013). Maxout networks. In Proceedings of The 30th International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 13191327.
- Graves, A. (2012). Sequence transduction with recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2012) .
- Graves, A. (2013). Generating sequences with recurrent neural networks. arXiv: 1308.0850 [cs.NE] . · arXiv
- Graves, A., Jaitly, N., and Mohamed, A.-R. (2013). Hybrid speech recognition with deep bidirectional LSTM. In Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (ASRU), 2013 IEEE Workshop on , pages 273-278.
- Hermann, K. and Blunsom, P. (2014). Multilingual distributed representations without word alignment. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2014) .
- Hochreiter, S. (1991). Untersuchungen zu dynamischen neuronalen Netzen. Diploma thesis, Institut f¨ ur Informatik, Lehrstuhl Prof. Brauer, Technische Universit¨ at M¨ unchen.
- Hochreiter, S. and Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation , 9 (8), 1735-1780.
- Kalchbrenner, N. and Blunsom, P. (2013). Recurrent continuous translation models. In Proceedings of the ACL Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) , pages 1700-1709. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Koehn, P. (2010). Statistical Machine Translation . Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.
- Koehn, P., Och, F. J., and Marcu, D. (2003). Statistical phrase-based translation. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology - Volume 1 , NAACL '03, pages 48-54, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Pascanu, R., Mikolov, T., and Bengio, Y. (2013a). On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks. In ICML'2013 .
- Pascanu, R., Mikolov, T., and Bengio, Y. (2013b). On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2013) .
- Pascanu, R., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., and Bengio, Y. (2014). How to construct deep recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2014) .
- Pouget-Abadie, J., Bahdanau, D., van Merri¨ enboer, B., Cho, K., and Bengio, Y. (2014). Overcoming the curse of sentence length for neural machine translation using automatic segmentation. In Eighth Workshop on Syntax, Semantics and Structure in Statistical Translation . to appear.
- Schuster, M. and Paliwal, K. K. (1997). Bidirectional recurrent neural networks. Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on , 45 (11), 2673-2681.
- Schwenk, H. (2012). Continuous space translation models for phrase-based statistical machine translation. In M. Kay and C. Boitet, editors, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLIN) , pages 1071-1080. Indian Institute of Technology Bombay.
- Schwenk, H., Dchelotte, D., and Gauvain, J.-L. (2006). Continuous space language models for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on Main conference poster sessions , pages 723-730. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., and Le, Q. (2014). Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2014) .
- Authors
- Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y.
- Affiliations
- Constructor University (DE)
- Université de Montréal (CA)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2014
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1409.0473
- OpenAlex
- W2133564696
- Cited by
- 16,213
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 113 · 2025: 678 · 2024: 1415 · 2023: 1883 · 2022: 1997 · 2021: 2650 · 2020: 2335 · 2019: 2294 · 2018: 1660 · 2017: 847 · 2016: 269 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- TIB Data Manager
- Funders
- Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
- Compute Canada
- Canada Research Chairs
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Keywords
- neural machine translation, encoder-decoder architecture, English-French translation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review