Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 314

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

College Students' Barriers and Enablers for Healthful Weight Management: A Qualitative Study

Open access
Greaney, Mary L., Less, Faith D., White, Adrienne A., Dayton, Sarah F., Riebe, Deborah, Blissmer, Bryan, Shoff, Suzanne, Walsh, Jennifer R., Greene, Geoffrey W.·2009·Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To identify barriers and enablers for healthful weight management among college students. DESIGN Sixteen on-line focus groups, homogeneous by sex and university. SETTING Eight universities in 8 states. PARTICIPANTS College students (N = 115; 55% female; mean age 19.7 +/- 1.6). ANALYSIS Qualitative software, Nvivo version 2 (QSR International, Victoria, Australia, 2002), was used; similar codes were grouped together and categorized using an ecological model. RESULTS Males and females cited the same barriers to weight management: intrapersonal (eg, temptation and lack of discipline); interpersonal (social situations); and environmental (eg, time constraints, ready access to unhealthful food). Similar enablers were identified by sex: intrapersonal (eg, regulating food intake, being physically active); interpersonal (social support); and environmental (eg, university's environment supports physical activity). More barriers than enablers were given, indicating that these college students were more sensitive to barriers than the enablers for weight management. Factors viewed by some students as barriers to weight management were viewed as enablers by others. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS When designing weight management interventions for college students, sex specificity may not be as important as considering that a barrier for one student may be an enabler for another. From an ecological perspective, individually focused interventions must be implemented in conjunction with environmental-level interventions to facilitate behavior change.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jneb.2008.04.354

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 314

Metadata

Authors
Greaney, M. L., Less, F. D., White, A. A., Dayton, S. F., Riebe, D., Blissmer, B., Shoff, S., Walsh, J. R., & Greene, G. W.
Venue
Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
281-286
ISSN
1499-4046 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095196079
Cited by
314
References
31
FWCI
21.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: College Students' Barriers and Enablers for Healthful Weight Management: A Qualitative Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jneb.2008.04.354
The paper
Greaney, M. L., Less, F. D., White, A. A., Dayton, S. F., Riebe, D., Blissmer, B., Shoff, S., Walsh, J. R., & Greene, G. W. (2009). College Students' Barriers and Enablers for Healthful Weight Management: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2008.04.354

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.