School Gardens: An Experiential Learning Approach for a Nutrition Education Program to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Knowledge, Preference, and Consumption among Second-grade Students
Abstract
Objective To examine the effects of a school garden on children's fruit and vegetable knowledge, preference, and consumption.Design Self-report questionnaires, interview-style taste and rate items, lunchroom observations.Setting An elementary school.Participants Second-grade students (n = 115).Intervention Participants were assigned to one of 3 groups: (1) nutrition education and gardening (NE+G) treatment group, (2) nutrition education only (NE) treatment group, or (3) control group (CG). Both treatment groups received classroom instruction, and the NE+G group also received a school gardening experience.Main outcome measures Fruit and vegetable knowledge, preference, and consumption.Analysis Analyses of variance (alpha = .05).Results Participants in the NE+G and NE treatment groups exhibited significantly greater improvements in nutrition knowledge and taste ratings than did participants in the CG. Moreover, the NE+G group was more likely to choose and consume vegetables in a lunchroom setting at post-assessment than either the NE or CG groups.Conclusions and implications School gardens as a component of nutrition education can increase fruit and vegetable knowledge and cause behavior change among children. These findings suggest that school administrators, classroom teachers, and nutrition educators should implement school gardens as a way to positively influence dietary habits at an early age.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Garden-based education programs significantly increased preferences for fruits and vegetables in 4 of 8 studies, willingness to try new fruits and vegetables in 4 of 5 studies, and levels of consumption of fruits and vegetables in 4 of 5 studies.
“Overall, the garden-based programs significantly increased preferences for fruits and vegetables in 4 of 8 studies, willingness to try new fruits and vegetables in 4 of 5 studies, and levels of consumption of fruits and vegetables in 4 of 5 studies.233–235”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [234]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 8 · Cited by 363
- Authors
- Parmer, S. M., Salisbury-Glennon, J., Shannon, D., & Struempler, B.
- Affiliations
- Auburn University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Parmer, Sondra M.
- ORCID
- Shannon, David
- Venue
- Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 212-217
- ISSN
- 1499-4046 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034196345
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 61.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
- Keywords
- school gardens, nutrition education, fruit and vegetable intake, fruit and vegetable preferences, children's dietary behavior, second grade students, experiential learning, elementary school students
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Child, Eating, Female, Food Preferences, Fruit, Health Education, Health Promotion, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Students, Vegetables, Southeastern United States, Self Efficacy, Gardening, Child Nutrition Sciences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review