Cited by 363Diverse Educational Innovations StudiesNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorUrban Agriculture and Sustainability

School Gardens: An Experiential Learning Approach for a Nutrition Education Program to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Knowledge, Preference, and Consumption among Second-grade Students

Parmer, Sondra M., Salisbury-Glennon, Jill, Shannon, David, Struempler, Barbara·2009·Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior

Abstract

Objective To examine the effects of a school garden on children's fruit and vegetable knowledge, preference, and consumption.Design Self-report questionnaires, interview-style taste and rate items, lunchroom observations.Setting An elementary school.Participants Second-grade students (n = 115).Intervention Participants were assigned to one of 3 groups: (1) nutrition education and gardening (NE+G) treatment group, (2) nutrition education only (NE) treatment group, or (3) control group (CG). Both treatment groups received classroom instruction, and the NE+G group also received a school gardening experience.Main outcome measures Fruit and vegetable knowledge, preference, and consumption.Analysis Analyses of variance (alpha = .05).Results Participants in the NE+G and NE treatment groups exhibited significantly greater improvements in nutrition knowledge and taste ratings than did participants in the CG. Moreover, the NE+G group was more likely to choose and consume vegetables in a lunchroom setting at post-assessment than either the NE or CG groups.Conclusions and implications School gardens as a component of nutrition education can increase fruit and vegetable knowledge and cause behavior change among children. These findings suggest that school administrators, classroom teachers, and nutrition educators should implement school gardens as a way to positively influence dietary habits at an early age.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jneb.2008.06.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Garden-based education programs significantly increased preferences for fruits and vegetables in 4 of 8 studies, willingness to try new fruits and vegetables in 4 of 5 studies, and levels of consumption of fruits and vegetables in 4 of 5 studies.

    “Overall, the garden-based programs significantly increased preferences for fruits and vegetables in 4 of 8 studies, willingness to try new fruits and vegetables in 4 of 5 studies, and levels of consumption of fruits and vegetables in 4 of 5 studies.233–235”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 8 · Cited by 363

Authors
Parmer, S. M., Salisbury-Glennon, J., Shannon, D., & Struempler, B.
Affiliations
Auburn University (US)
Corresponding author
Parmer, Sondra M.
Venue
Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
212-217
ISSN
1499-4046 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034196345
Cited by
363
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 27
FWCI
61.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
Keywords
school gardens, nutrition education, fruit and vegetable intake, fruit and vegetable preferences, children's dietary behavior, second grade students, experiential learning, elementary school students
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Child, Eating, Female, Food Preferences, Fruit, Health Education, Health Promotion, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Students, Vegetables, Southeastern United States, Self Efficacy, Gardening, Child Nutrition Sciences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review