The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: A new approach to Granger-causal inference
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND Wiener-Granger causality ("G-causality") is a statistical notion of causality applicable to time series data, whereby cause precedes, and helps predict, effect. It is defined in both time and frequency domains, and allows for the conditioning out of common causal influences. Originally developed in the context of econometric theory, it has since achieved broad application in the neurosciences and beyond. Prediction in the G-causality formalism is based on VAR (vector autoregressive) modelling. NEW METHOD The MVGC Matlab© Toolbox approach to G-causal inference is based on multiple equivalent representations of a VAR model by (i) regression parameters, (ii) the autocovariance sequence and (iii) the cross-power spectral density of the underlying process. It features a variety of algorithms for moving between these representations, enabling selection of the most suitable algorithms with regard to computational efficiency and numerical accuracy. RESULTS In this paper we explain the theoretical basis, computational strategy and application to empirical G-causal inference of the MVGC Toolbox. We also show via numerical simulations the advantages of our Toolbox over previous methods in terms of computational accuracy and statistical inference. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S) The standard method of computing G-causality involves estimation of parameters for both a full and a nested (reduced) VAR model. The MVGC approach, by contrast, avoids explicit estimation of the reduced model, thus eliminating a source of estimation error and improving statistical power, and in addition facilitates fast and accurate estimation of the computationally awkward case of conditional G-causality in the frequency domain. CONCLUSIONS The MVGC Toolbox implements a flexible, powerful and efficient approach to G-causal inference.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing
Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913236 · Cited by 32,007
Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods
Granger, C. W. J. (1969) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912791 · Cited by 22,989
Jolliffe, I. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/0470013192.bsa501 · Cited by 14,310
An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series
Cooley, J. W., & Tukey, J. W. (1965) · Mathematics of Computation · doi:10.1090/s0025-5718-1965-0178586-1 · Cited by 13,154
Welch, P. (1967) · IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics · doi:10.1109/tau.1967.1161901 · Cited by 12,277
Discrete-Time Signal Processing
Oppenheim, A. V., & Schafer, R. W. (1989) · Cited by 11,775
Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference
Pearl, J. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803161 · Cited by 11,653
Breitung, J., & Hamilton, J. D. (1995) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2076916 · Cited by 10,966
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120
Independent Component Analysis
(2004) · Independent Component Analysis · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3717.003.0014 · Cited by 7,903
Cited by
A Tutorial Review of Functional Connectivity Analysis Methods and Their Interpretational Pitfalls
Bastos, A. M., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2016) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00175 · Cited by 1,313
Granger causality analysis in neuroscience and neuroimaging
Seth, A. K., Barrett, A. B., & Barnett, L. (2015) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4399-14.2015 · Cited by 928
Self-citationvan Kerkoerle, T., Self, M. W., Dagnino, B., Gariel-Mathis, M.-A., Poort, J., van der Togt, C., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1402773111 · Cited by 918
Thalamic amplification of cortical connectivity sustains attentional control
Schmitt, L. I., Wimmer, R. D., Nakajima, M., Happ, M., Mofakham, S., & Halassa, M. M. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22073 · Cited by 663
Mejias, J. F., Murray, J. D., Kennedy, H., & Wang, X.-J. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1601335 · Cited by 227
Metadata
- Authors
- Barnett, L., & Seth, A. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience Methods
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 223
- Pages
- 50-68
- ISSN
- 0165-0270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2116031726
- Cited by
- 1,044
- References
- 104
- FWCI
- 18.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: A new approach to Granger-causal inference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.018
- The paper
- Barnett, L., & Seth, A. K. (2014). The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: A new approach to Granger-causal inference. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.