The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) and PEBL Test Battery
Open accessAbstract
Background We briefly describe the Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL), an open source software system for designing and running psychological experiments. New Method We describe the PEBL test battery, a set of approximately 70 behavioral tests which can be freely used, shared, and modified. Included is a comprehensive set of past research upon which tests in the battery are based. Results We report the results of benchmark tests that establish the timing precision of PEBL. Comparison with Existing Method We consider alternatives to the PEBL system and battery tests. Conclusions We conclude with a discussion of the ethical factors involved in the open source testing movement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Social Work · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,519
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research
(1988) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62386-9 · Cited by 15,003
Posner, M. I. (1980) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/00335558008248231 · Cited by 9,670 · cited 1×
“…specific dimension of previous target Anderson et al., 2012* Posner Cueing task spatialcuing Respond to stimulus in probabalistically-cued location Posner, 1980 Probabilistic Reversal Learning probrev Learn when a probabilistic rule shifts Cools et al., 2002 Probability Monitor probmonitor Detect…”
BackgroundMeasuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · Cited by 9,210
The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.
Fitts, P. M. (1954) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0055392 · Cited by 6,466 · cited 1×
“Test Name Directory Name Description References Aimed Movement test fitts Use mouse to point to targets of difference sizes and distances Fitts, 1954; Mueller, 2010* Attentional Network Test ANT Combines orienting, cuing, and flanker-based filtered attention Fan et al., 2002 Balloon Analog Risk…”
BackgroundThe information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.
Fitts, P. M. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.121.3.262 · Cited by 6,278
Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex
Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3 · Cited by 6,128
PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python
Peirce, J. W. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017 · Cited by 4,603
Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892902317361886 · Cited by 3,717
Cited by
Thomas, A. G., Dennis, A., Rawlings, N. B., Stagg, C. J., Matthews, L., Morris, M., Kolind, S. H., Foxley, S., Jenkinson, M., Nichols, T. E., et al. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.090 · Cited by 152
“All tasks were administered using paper and pencil except for the digit span test which was administered by computer using the PEBL software package (Mueller and Piper, 2014) in a stepwise fashion as described in Woods et al. (2010).”
MethodPanikratova, Y. R., Vlasova, R. M., Akhutina, T. V., Korneev, A. A., Sinitsyn, V. E., & Pechenkova, E. V. (2020) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.02.013 · Cited by 119
Asgharian Asl, F., & Vaghef, L. (2022) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.01.025 · Cited by 58
Navigating the link between processing speed and network communication in the human brain
Imms, P., Domínguez D, J. F., Burmester, A., Seguin, C., Clemente, A., Dhollander, T., Wilson, P. H., Poudel, G., & Caeyenberghs, K. (2021) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-021-02241-8 · Cited by 39
Immersive Virtual Reality-Based Methods for Assessing Executive Functioning: Systematic Review
Kirkham, R., Kooijman, L., Albertella, L., Myles, D., Yücel, M., & Rotaru, K. (2024) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/50282 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Mueller, S. T., & Piper, B. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience Methods
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 222
- Pages
- 250-259
- ISSN
- 0165-0270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048250663
- Cited by
- 1,085
- References
- 74
- FWCI
- 90.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) and PEBL Test Battery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.024
- The paper
- Mueller, S. T., & Piper, B. J. (2014). The Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) and PEBL Test Battery. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
