A translational framework for peripheral nerve stimulating electrodes: Reviewing the journey from concept to clinic
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this review article is to describe the underlying methodology for successfully translating novel interfaces for electrical modulation of the peripheral nervous system (PNS) from basic design concepts to clinical applications and chronic human use. Despite advances in technologies to communicate directly with the nervous system, the pathway to clinical translation for most neural interfaces is not clear. FDA guidelines provide information on necessary evidence which should be generated and submitted to allow the agency evaluate safety and efficacy of a new medical device. However, a knowledge gap exists on translating neural interfaces from pre-clinical studies into the clinical domain. Our article is intended to inform the field on some of the key considerations for such a transition process specific to neural interfaces that may not be already covered by FDA guidances. This framework focuses on non-penetrating peripheral nerve stimulating electrodes that have been proven effective for motor and sensory neural prostheses and successfully transitioned from pre-clinical through first-in-human and chronic clinical deployment. We discuss the challenges of moving these neural interfaces along the translational continuum and ultimately through FDA approval for human feasibility studies. Specifically, we describe a translational process involving: quantitative human anatomy, neural modeling and simulation, acute intraoperative testing and verification, clinical demonstration with temporary percutaneous access, and finally chronic clinical deployment and functional performance. To clarify and demonstrate the importance of each step of this translational framework, we present case studies from electrodes developed at Case Western Reserve University (CWRU), specifically the spiral cuff, the Flat Interface Nerve Electrode (FINE), and the Composite FINE (C-FINE). In addition, we demonstrate that success along this translational pathway can be further expedited by: appropriate selection of well-characterized materials, validation of fabrication and sterilization protocols, well-implemented quality control measures, and quantification of impact on neural structure, health, and function. The issues and approaches identified in this review for the peripheral nervous system may also serve to accelerate the dissemination of any new neural interface into clinical practice, and consequently advance the performance, utility, and clinical value of new neural prostheses or neuromodulation systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Customisation to neural targets helps mitigate the potential risks in the process of translating novel solutions in peripheral nerve interfacing to the clinical setting.
“In addition to the verification of interface safety, quality, and impact, the customisation to neural targets helps mitigate the potential risks in the process [217].”
From Active Neural Interface Circuits and Systems for Selective Control of Peripheral Nerves: A Review (2024) · cites this paper as [217]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 94 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Charkhkar, H., Christie, B. P., Pinault, G. J., Tyler, D. J., & Triolo, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Charkhkar, Hamid
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience Methods
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 328
- Pages
- 108414
- ISSN
- 0165-0270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2970400385
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 0.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience Methods (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Keywords
- neural interfaces, clinical translation, FDA guidance, neural prostheses, neuromodulation, electrode materials, quality control, human anatomy
- MeSH terms
- Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Humans, Neurosciences, Peripheral Nervous System, Translational Research, Biomedical, Neural Prostheses
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review