Cited by 22Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Age- and sex-dependent alterations in the peripheral immune system in the 3xTg-AD mouse model of Alzheimer's disease: Increased proportion of CD3+CD4-CD8- double-negative T cells in the blood

Nava Catorce, Miryam, Acero, Gonzalo, Gevorkian, Goar·2021·Journal of Neuroimmunology

Abstract

It is well documented that sporadic Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a multifactorial disease and considered to be a result of several pathological events, both in the periphery and in the brain. The role of the peripheral immune system in the etiology and/or progression of the disease is not fully understood yet, and the results in humans are contradictory so far. Several animal models of AD have been generated and thoroughly characterized to elucidate disease mechanisms and evaluate numerous therapeutic strategies in preclinical studies. In the present study, we carried out a longitudinal evaluation of blood lymphocytes from male and female 3xTg-AD mice to document important immunological abnormalities in the periphery. We documented the age-dependent decrease in the percentage of CD3+ and CD4+ lymphocytes and an increase in the percentage CD3+CD4-CD8- (DN T) cells in the blood of 3xTg-AD mice compared with non-transgenic animals. Severe splenomegaly was observed in 3xTg-AD mice in contrast to wild-type animals. Importantly, all these abnormalities in the peripheral immune system appeared earlier and were more pronounced in males compared with females of the same age, which may account for the shorter lifespan of male mice. We suggest that future research should include the measurement of CD3+ and DN T cells as a potential immunological marker of disease progression in AD patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2021.577720

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nava Catorce, M., Acero, G., & Gevorkian, G.
Affiliations
Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Corresponding author
Gevorkian, Goar
Venue
Journal of Neuroimmunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
360
Pages
577720
ISSN
0165-5728 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3200298856
Cited by
22
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroimmunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
  • Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
  • Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (203319)
  • Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, 3xTg-AD mice, peripheral immune system, double-negative T cells, CD3+CD4-CD8- T cells, blood lymphocytes, sex differences, splenomegaly, immunological biomarkers, disease progression
MeSH terms
Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Humans, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Sex Characteristics, CD4 Antigens, T-Lymphocyte Subsets, CD8 Antigens, CD3 Complex, Disease Progression, Lymphocyte Count, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review