Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 19Healthcare Systems and TechnologyTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationElectronic Health Records Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Leveraging Electronic Consultations to Address Severe Subspecialty Care Access Gaps in Nigeria

Abstract

Nigeria, Africa's most populous nation, is experiencing a dire challenge in meeting the specialty care access needs for its people, with extremely limited capacity to deliver subspecialty healthcare. Telemedicine/telehealth has been offered as a part of the solution to resolve health inequities, maldistribution and "brain drain" for health care services. In this preliminary communication, we assessed the impact of a telehealth innovation, subspecialty clinician-to-clinician electronic consultations (eConsult), on general practitioners (GPs) serving a diverse patient population in Nigeria. We found high levels of utilization of the eConsult platform by Nigerian physicians for a variety of cases and subspecialties. The most commonly used specialties were Obstetrics/Gynecology, Pediatric specialties and subspecialties, and Dermatology. Nigerian GPs spent more time generating and submitting their eConsults than American counterparts, but high levels of physician satisfaction and education from the eConsults. GPs reported the reduction in unnecessary services and improved care plans in the majority of cases, suggesting the tremendous potential for eConsults to build capacity for clinicians in nations where subspecialty care services are scarce.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jnma.2019.10.005

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Olayiwola, 2019, Clinical transformation in technology: a fresh change management approach for primary care, Harvard Health Pol Rev

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Olayiwola, J. N., Udenyi, E. D., Yusuf, G., Magaña, C., Patel, R., Duck, B., Sajanlal, S., Potapov, A., & Kibuka, C.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Olayiwola, J. Nwando
Venue
Journal of the National Medical Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
112
Issue
1
Pages
97-102
ISSN
0027-9684 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005276588
Cited by
19
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the National Medical Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
e-consultation, telemedicine, general practitioners, physician satisfaction, health workforce capacity, brain drain, health disparities, Nigeria
MeSH terms
Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Nigeria, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Telemedicine, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.