The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Leveraging Electronic Consultations to Address Severe Subspecialty Care Access Gaps in Nigeria
Abstract
Nigeria, Africa's most populous nation, is experiencing a dire challenge in meeting the specialty care access needs for its people, with extremely limited capacity to deliver subspecialty healthcare. Telemedicine/telehealth has been offered as a part of the solution to resolve health inequities, maldistribution and "brain drain" for health care services. In this preliminary communication, we assessed the impact of a telehealth innovation, subspecialty clinician-to-clinician electronic consultations (eConsult), on general practitioners (GPs) serving a diverse patient population in Nigeria. We found high levels of utilization of the eConsult platform by Nigerian physicians for a variety of cases and subspecialties. The most commonly used specialties were Obstetrics/Gynecology, Pediatric specialties and subspecialties, and Dermatology. Nigerian GPs spent more time generating and submitting their eConsults than American counterparts, but high levels of physician satisfaction and education from the eConsults. GPs reported the reduction in unnecessary services and improved care plans in the majority of cases, suggesting the tremendous potential for eConsults to build capacity for clinicians in nations where subspecialty care services are scarce.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Research suggests that poor internet connectivity can impact negatively on the quality of consultations (Annan et al., 2018), due to delay in the transmission of information from primary healthcare worker to other clinical collaborators (Olayiwola et al., 2020).”
From Telemedicine use in Sub-Saharan Africa: Barriers and policy recommendations for Covid-19 and beyond (2021) · cites this paper as Olayiwola et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“It is demonstrated teledermatology is applicable in support in auxiliary health workers in LMIC.”
From Current evidence on the use of mHealth approaches in Sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review (2023) · cites this paper as [58]
Citations
Cites
Leveraging an electronic referral system to build a medical neighborhood
Tuot, D. S., Murphy, E. J., McCulloch, C. E., Leeds, K., Chan, E. C. Y., & Chen, A. H. (2015) · Healthcare · doi:10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.04.001 · Cited by 44
Telemedicine and biomedical care in Africa: Prospects and challenges
Chukwuneke, F., Okoroafor, I., Ifebunandu, N. A., Onyeka, T. C., Ekwueme, C. O., & Agwuna, K. K. (2016) · Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice · doi:10.4103/1119-3077.180065 · Cited by 38
Olayiwola, J. N., Potapov, A., Gordon, A., Jurado, J., Magaña, C., Knox, M. J., & Tuot, D. S. (2018) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x18784416 · Cited by 37
Self-citationProspects and challenges of telemedicine in Nigeria
Ukaoha, K. C., & Egbokhare, F. A. (2012) · Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences · doi:10.7813/jmbs.2012/3-1/10 · Cited by 13
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Olayiwola, 2019, Clinical transformation in technology: a fresh change management approach for primary care, Harvard Health Pol Rev
Cited by
Telemedicine use in Sub-Saharan Africa: Barriers and policy recommendations for Covid-19 and beyond
Dodoo, J. E., Al-Samarraie, H., & Alzahrani, A. I. (2021) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104467 · Cited by 125
“tivity can impact negatively on the quality of consultations [21], due to delay in the transmission of information from primary healthcare worker to other clinical collaborators [22].”
BackgroundPost pandemic analysis on comprehensive utilization of telehealth and telemedicine
Ndwabe, H., Basu, A., & Mohammed, J. (2023) · Clinical eHealth · doi:10.1016/j.ceh.2023.12.002 · Cited by 88
The development of telemedicine programs in Sub-Saharan Africa: Progress and associated challenges
Dodoo, J. E., Al-Samarraie, H., & Alsswey, A. (2022) · Health and Technology · doi:10.1007/s12553-021-00626-7 · Cited by 68
Current evidence on the use of mHealth approaches in Sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review
Aboye, G. T., Vande Walle, M., Simegn, G. L., & Aerts, J.-M. (2023) · Health Policy and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100806 · Cited by 55
Physician Satisfaction With Telehealth: A Systematic Review and Agenda for Future Research
Hoff, T., & Lee, D.-R. (2022) · Quality Management in Health Care · doi:10.1097/qmh.0000000000000359 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Olayiwola, J. N., Udenyi, E. D., Yusuf, G., Magaña, C., Patel, R., Duck, B., Sajanlal, S., Potapov, A., & Kibuka, C.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Olayiwola, J. Nwando
- Venue
- Journal of the National Medical Association
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-102
- ISSN
- 0027-9684 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3005276588
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 3.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the National Medical Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Technology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Keywords
- e-consultation, telemedicine, general practitioners, physician satisfaction, health workforce capacity, brain drain, health disparities, Nigeria
- MeSH terms
- Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Nigeria, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Telemedicine, Healthcare Disparities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
