Cited by 16Diversity and Career in MedicineMedical Education and AdmissionsHealth and Medical Research Impacts

Creating a Comprehensive Approach to Exposing Underrepresented Pre-health Professions Students to Clinical Medicine and Health Research

Stewart, Kerry-Ann, Brown, Stacey L., Wrensford, Granville, Hurley, Marja M.·2020·Journal of the National Medical Association

Abstract

Background/purpose With the urgency to create more equitable health care, increased research and early exposure to health interventions and clinical medicine are imperative. Health disparities continue to persist nationwide, particularly in underserved areas and among traditionally disadvantaged populations. In addition to the need to eliminate health disparities, increasing the diversity among health professionals to more accurately reflect the US population is essential. Methods The health professions partnership at the School of Medicine and the School of Dental Medicine is a comprehensive pipeline designed to increase the preparation of underrepresented students for health careers. Through this health professions pipeline's Health Disparities Clinical Summer Research Fellowship Program (HDCSRFP), undergraduate students are exposed to health disparities research and clinical skills over seven weeks. Over the course of the program, participants conducted a research project, gained clinical exposure by shadowing community physicians and other health professionals, and received mentoring by health professional faculty and students. At the conclusion of the program, participants presented their research projects during a poster symposium. Results A total of 121 program participants between 2008 and 2018 each conducted a research project focused on reducing health inequities within specific populations, particularly in urban settings. The health professions pipeline has been in…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jnma.2019.12.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stewart, K.-A., Brown, S. L., Wrensford, G., & Hurley, M. M.
Affiliations
UConn Health (US)
Corresponding author
Stewart, Kerry-Ann
Venue
Journal of the National Medical Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
112
Issue
1
Pages
36-43
ISSN
0027-9684 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3001406486
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3
FWCI
4.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the National Medical Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Connecticut Health Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
Keywords
underrepresented students, health disparities research, clinical shadowing, mentoring, diversity in health professions, medical school admissions, summer research fellowship, health equity, urban health disparities
MeSH terms
Career Choice, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Health Occupations, Health Services Research, Humans, Minority Groups, Schools, Medical, Program Evaluation, Clinical Medicine, Students, Public Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review