Cited by 48Gun Ownership and Violence ResearchUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation StudiesHealth disparities and outcomes

Differences in Racial Disparities in Firearm Homicide across Cities: The Role of Racial Residential Segregation and Gaps in Structural Disadvantage

Wong, Brooke, Bernstein, Serena, Jay, Jonathan, Siegel, Michael·2020·Journal of the National Medical Association

Abstract

Background/purpose Little research has characterized racial differences in firearm homicide at the city level. In this study, we explicitly model trends from 2000 to 2017 in the gap in homicide rates between the Black and White populations of 275 U.S. cities. Methods We used latent trajectory analysis and latent multi-trajectory analysis to identify distinct groups of cities with similar trends over time in: (a) Black and White firearm homicide rates; and (b) the ratio of the Black to White firearm homicide rates. We used a hierarchical, random effects model to examine the impact of racial segregation and racial gaps in structural disadvantage on the extent of the racial disparity in firearm homicide in each city. Results We found that racial residential segregation predicts differences between cities in the magnitude of racial disparities in firearm homicide rates. Conclusion Reducing racial disparities in firearm homicide may require programs and policies that specifically address the adverse consequences of racial segregation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jnma.2020.05.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The data demonstrate the effects of long-standing structural racism on the epidemiology of firearm injuries.

    “Combined with the fact that the vast majority of firearm injuries in these urban areas were to Black males, the data demonstrate the effects of long-standing structural racism on the epidemiology of firearm injuries [9–11].”

    From Firearm injuries in Missouri (2023) · cites this paper as [11]

  • Racial disparities are evident in the study cohort.

    “Racial disparities are evident in our cohort, as observed in other local and national studies.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 36 · Cited by 48

Authors
Wong, B., Bernstein, S., Jay, J., & Siegel, M.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Siegel, Michael
Venue
Journal of the National Medical Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
112
Issue
5
Pages
518-530
ISSN
0027-9684 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3040018595
Cited by
48
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the National Medical Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
firearm homicide, racial disparities, racial residential segregation, structural disadvantage
MeSH terms
Social Segregation, Black or African American, Cities, Homicide, Humans, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review