Cited by 19Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesGender, Health, and Social Inequality

Structural racism and racial health disparities at the state level: A latent variable approach

Open access
Siegel, Michael, Rieders, Madeline, Rieders, Hannah, Moumneh, Jinan, Asfour, Julia, Oh, Jinseo, Oh, Seungjin·2023·Journal of the National Medical Association

Abstract

Introduction Structural racism is increasingly being recognized as a fundamental cause of racial health disparities. We used a novel measure of structural racism at the state level to examine the relationship between structural racism and disparities in death rates from firearm homicide, infant mortality, HIV, diabetes, stroke, hypertension, asthma, and kidney disease between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White people in the United States. Methods We used confirmatory factor analysis to measure the latent construct of structural racism for all 50 states. The model included seven indicators across the structural racism domains of residential segregation, economic status/employment, education, incarceration, political participation and representation, environmental racism, and racial equity inclusion. Weights for each of the indicators were determined by examining alternative models and selecting the model with the best fit statistics. The resulting factor scores, representing the level of structural racism in each state across the seven domains, were then used as predictor variables in a series of linear regressions with the ratio of Black to White death rates for each health outcome as the dependent variables. Results We found significant relationships between higher levels of the latent structural racism measure and greater disparities between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White people in age-adjusted death rates for firearm homicide, infant mortality, HIV, asthm…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jnma.2023.07.003

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siegel, M., Rieders, M., Rieders, H., Moumneh, J., Asfour, J., Oh, J., & Oh, S.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Siegel, Michael
Venue
Journal of the National Medical Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
115
Issue
4
Pages
338-352
ISSN
0027-9684 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385242167
Cited by
19
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7
FWCI
8.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the National Medical Association (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
structural racism, racial disparities in health, firearm homicide, infant mortality, HIV, asthma, obesity, black-white disparities, residential segregation, environmental racism, incarceration, political representation, racial equity, fundamental causes
MeSH terms
Social Segregation, White, Black or African American, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Homicide, Humans, Infant, Infant Mortality, Male, United States, White People, Health Status Disparities, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review