Cited by 958Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesGender, Health, and Social Inequality

Discrimination and Health Inequities

Open access
Krieger, Nancy·2014·International Journal of Health Services

Abstract

In 1999, only 20 studies in the public health literature employed instruments to measure self-reported experiences of discrimination. Fifteen years later, the number of empirical investigations on discrimination and health easily exceeds 500, with these studies increasingly global in scope and focused on major types of discrimination variously involving race/ethnicity, indigenous status, immigrant status, gender, sexuality, disability, and age, separately and in combination. And yet, as I also document, even as the number of investigations has dramatically expanded, the scope remains narrow: studies remain focused primarily on interpersonal discrimination, and scant research investigates the health impacts of structural discrimination, a gap consonant with the limited epidemiologic research on political systems and population health. Accordingly, to help advance the state of the field, this updated review article: ( a) briefly reviews definitions of discrimination, illustrated with examples from the United States; ( b) discusses theoretical insights useful for conceptualizing how discrimination can become embodied and produce health inequities, including via distortion of scientific knowledge; ( c) concisely summarizes extant evidence—both robust and inconsistent—linking discrimination and health; and ( d) addresses several key methodological controversies and challenges, including the need for careful attention to domains, pathways, level, and spatiotemporal scale, in historical context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2190/hs.44.4.b

Cites

215 of 215 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krieger, N.
Corresponding author
Krieger, Nancy
Venue
International Journal of Health Services
Published
2014-10
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
643-710
ISSN
  • 0020-7314 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-4469
OpenAlex
W2109235191
Cited by
953
References
215
Citations by year
2026: 80 · 2025: 98 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 164 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
91.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Health Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG027122)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
discrimination, health disparities, structural discrimination, interpersonal discrimination, self-reported discrimination, race and ethnicity, Indigenous status, immigrant status, gender, sexuality, disability, age, discrimination measurement, methodological issues
MeSH terms
Humans, Prejudice, Research, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Health Status Disparities, Healthcare Disparities, Social Determinants of Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review