Psychological and emotional experiences of participants in a medical school, early assurance admissions program targeting students from groups underrepresented in medicine
Abstract
Background There are growing number of pathway programs, with an early assurance of admission, that target undergraduate students from groups underrepresented in medicine (URiM) to enable their competitiveness for and matriculation to medical school, including the Penn Access Summer Scholars (PASS) program. The psychological and emotional experiences of students in these programs, however, have not been previously described. Methods Students from the summer 2021 cohort of the PASS program were interviewed using a structured set of questions that explored four specific areas: (i) the application process; (ii) the benefits and value of being in the PASS program; (iii) the emotional and psychological challenges and stresses of being in the PASS program; (iv) feelings and emotions about not taking the MCAT or having to interview at multiple schools. The transcribed, de-identified interviews were then subjected to a qualitative analysis. Results Students in PASS reported that the program was valuable to them in that it reduced the stress of the pre-medical process; relieved worry and anxiety surrounding the MCAT; enabled development of supportive relationships and provided meaningful exposures to the medical profession and biomedical research. Despite this, students reported feelings of imposterism, guilt, and fear of disappointing, along with varying degrees of regret over not taking the MCAT and not interviewing at more than one medical school. Conclusions URiM and other margina…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Participants in the Penn Access Summer Scholars (PASS) program at University of Pennsylvania reported feeling satisfied with valuable exposure to medical profession and biomedical research.
“Participants in the Penn Access Summer Scholars (PASS) program at University of Pennsylvania reported feeling satisfied with valuable exposure to medical profession and biomedical research (Zhou et al., 2024).”
From Pathway to Medicine and Health Programs Revisited: Outcomes and Institutional Adaptations in Greater Philadelphia and Beyond (2026) · cites this paper as Zhou et al., 2024
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bright, D., Hughes, S., & Muir, R. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16010170 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhou, C., Okafor, C., Greisz, J., Ryu, H.-S., Hagood, J., & DeLisser, H. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- DeLisser, Horace M.
- Venue
- Journal of the National Medical Association
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-02
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-32
- ISSN
- 0027-9684 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4389219881
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the National Medical Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Pennsylvania
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (R25 HL084665)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Keywords
- underrepresented in medicine, medical school admissions, pathway programs, impostor syndrome, guilt, anxiety, MCAT, student emotions, psychological stress
- MeSH terms
- Emotions, Humans, Minority Groups, Schools, Medical, Students, Students, Medical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review