Cited by 3Medical Education and AdmissionsDiversity and Career in MedicineHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

Psychological and emotional experiences of participants in a medical school, early assurance admissions program targeting students from groups underrepresented in medicine

Zhou, Cecilia, Okafor, Chielozor, Greisz, Justin, Ryu, Han-Seul, Hagood, Jamal, DeLisser, Horace M.·2024·Journal of the National Medical Association

Abstract

Background There are growing number of pathway programs, with an early assurance of admission, that target undergraduate students from groups underrepresented in medicine (URiM) to enable their competitiveness for and matriculation to medical school, including the Penn Access Summer Scholars (PASS) program. The psychological and emotional experiences of students in these programs, however, have not been previously described. Methods Students from the summer 2021 cohort of the PASS program were interviewed using a structured set of questions that explored four specific areas: (i) the application process; (ii) the benefits and value of being in the PASS program; (iii) the emotional and psychological challenges and stresses of being in the PASS program; (iv) feelings and emotions about not taking the MCAT or having to interview at multiple schools. The transcribed, de-identified interviews were then subjected to a qualitative analysis. Results Students in PASS reported that the program was valuable to them in that it reduced the stress of the pre-medical process; relieved worry and anxiety surrounding the MCAT; enabled development of supportive relationships and provided meaningful exposures to the medical profession and biomedical research. Despite this, students reported feelings of imposterism, guilt, and fear of disappointing, along with varying degrees of regret over not taking the MCAT and not interviewing at more than one medical school. Conclusions URiM and other margina…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jnma.2023.11.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participants in the Penn Access Summer Scholars (PASS) program at University of Pennsylvania reported feeling satisfied with valuable exposure to medical profession and biomedical research.

    “Participants in the Penn Access Summer Scholars (PASS) program at University of Pennsylvania reported feeling satisfied with valuable exposure to medical profession and biomedical research (Zhou et al., 2024).”

Cited by

Authors
Zhou, C., Okafor, C., Greisz, J., Ryu, H.-S., Hagood, J., & DeLisser, H. M.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
DeLisser, Horace M.
Venue
Journal of the National Medical Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-02
Volume
116
Issue
1
Pages
24-32
ISSN
0027-9684 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389219881
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the National Medical Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (R25 HL084665)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
underrepresented in medicine, medical school admissions, pathway programs, impostor syndrome, guilt, anxiety, MCAT, student emotions, psychological stress
MeSH terms
Emotions, Humans, Minority Groups, Schools, Medical, Students, Students, Medical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review