Cited by 361Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesPeripheral Neuropathies and DisordersAutoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments

Cerebrospinal fluid findings in aquaporin-4 antibody positive neuromyelitis optica: Results from 211 lumbar punctures

Jarius, S., Paul, F., Franciotta, D., Ruprecht, K., Ringelstein, M., Bergamaschi, R., Rommer, P., Kleiter, I. +9 more·2011·Journal of the Neurological Sciences

Abstract

Background Neuromyelitis optica (NMO, Devic disease) is a severely disabling autoimmune disorder of the CNS, which was considered a subtype of multiple sclerosis (MS) for many decades. Recently, however, highly specific serum autoantibodies (termed NMO-IgG or AQP4-Ab) have been discovered in a subset (60-80%) of patients with NMO. These antibodies were subsequently shown to be directly involved in the pathogenesis of the condition. AQP4-Ab positive NMO is now considered an immunopathogenetically distinct disease in its own right. However, to date little is known about the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in AQP4-Ab positive NMO. Objective To describe systematically the CSF profile of AQP4-Ab positive patients with NMO or its formes frustes, longitudinally extensive myelitis and optic neuritis. Material and methods Cytological and protein biochemical results from 211 lumbar punctures in 89 AQP4-Ab positive patients of mostly Caucasian origin with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) were analysed retrospectively. Results CSF-restricted oligoclonal IgG bands, a hallmark of MS, were absent in most patients. If present, intrathecal IgG (and, more rarely, IgM) synthesis was low, transient, and, importantly, restricted to acute relapses. CSF pleocytosis was present in around 50% of samples, was mainly mild (median, 19 cells/μl; range 6-380), and frequently included neutrophils, eosinophils, activated lymphocytes, and/or plasma cells. Albumin CSF/serum ratios, total protein and…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jns.2011.03.038

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CSF in NMOSD occasionally shows features distinct from MS (white cell count >50 cells/cm3, neutrophils or eosinophils >5 cells/cm3); however, a mild CSF pleocytosis is more common (white cell count <25 cells/cm3).

    “CSF occasionally shows features distinct from MS (white cell count >50 cells/cm 3 , neutrophils or eosinophils >5 cells/cm 3 ); however, a mild CSF pleocytosis is more common (white cell count <25 cells/cm 3 ).52”

    From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [52]

  • In contrast to MS, CSF OCBs are uncommon in patients with NMOSD (<20%).

    “In contrast to MS CSF OCBs are uncommon in patients with NMOSD (<20%).52”

    From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [52]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jarius, S., Paul, F., Franciotta, D., Ruprecht, K., Ringelstein, M., Bergamaschi, R., Rommer, P., Kleiter, I., Stich, O., Reuss, R., Rauer, S., Zettl, U. K., Wandinger, K. P., Melms, A., Aktas, O., Kristoferitsch, W., & Wildemann, B.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Nazionale Casimiro Mondino (IT)
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • University Hospital Regensburg (DE)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Bayreuth Medical Center (DE)
  • University of Rostock (DE)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Donauspital (AT)
Corresponding author
Wildemann, B.
Venue
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
306
Issue
1-2
Pages
82-90
ISSN
0022-510X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137385534
Cited by
361
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 18
FWCI
12.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Bayer HealthCare
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, aquaporin-4 antibodies, lumbar puncture findings, intrathecal IgG synthesis, oligoclonal bands, cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis, CSF lactate, optic neuritis, blood-CSF barrier dysfunction, disease activity, differential diagnosis from multiple sclerosis, immunopathogenesis, relapse
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Albumins, Antibodies, Blood-Brain Barrier, Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteins, Female, Humans, Leukocyte Count, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Neuromyelitis Optica, Serum Albumin, Spinal Puncture, Lactic Acid, Oligoclonal Bands, Aquaporin 4, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review