Cited by 103Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques

Sweet liking in patients with Parkinson’s disease.

Open access
Sienkiewicz-Jarosz, Halina, Scinska, Anna, Swiecicki, Lukasz, Lipczynska-Lojkowska, Wanda, Kuran, Wlodzimierz, Ryglewicz, Danuta, Kolaczkowski, Marcin, Samochowiec, Jerzy +1 more·2013·Journal of the Neurological Sciences

Abstract

Pleasant tastes and odors are considered phylogenetically old natural rewards and their hedonic evaluation is regarded as a good indicator of the reward system function. The primary aim of the present study was to compare pleasantness ratings of sucrose solutions (1-30%, w/w) and sweet liking/disliking status in 20 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and in 20 age-matched healthy controls. In addition, basic sensory aspects of gustatory (intensity ratings, electrogustometric thresholds) and olfactory function (identification abilities in the Sniffin' Stick test) were assessed in both groups. The number of odors rated as pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral was also compared. As expected, the PD patients showed a significant impairment in olfactory identification abilities. There were no differences between the PD patients and controls in electrogustometric thresholds. Rated intensity of higher sucrose concentrations did not differ between the groups. The PD patients tended to rate water taste as more intense in comparison with the controls. Pleasantness ratings of sucrose solutions, the proportion of subjects rating 30% sucrose as the most pleasant (sweet likers), and the number of odors rated as pleasant did not differ between the study groups. The present results suggest that PD does not lead to any obvious alterations in pleasantness ratings of chemosensory stimuli. The study requires replication in larger samples.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jns.2013.03.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Those dopamine suppressions did reduce people's subjective reports of wanting to consume more of the drug or food reward.

    “However, those dopamine suppressions did reduce people’s subjective reports of wanting to consume more of the drug or food reward.”

    From Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation (2018) · cites this paper as Sienkiewicz-Jarosz et al., 2013

  • Blockade of human dopamine receptors by antagonist drugs, or dietary-induced reductions of dopamine release, did not reduce people's subjective liking ratings for food pleasure, or for drug pleasures of cocaine or heroin.

    “Studies began to report that blockade of human dopamine receptors by antagonist drugs, or dietary-induced reductions of dopamine release, did not reduce people’s subjective liking ratings for food pleasure, or for drug pleasures of cocaine or heroin (Brauer and De Wit, 1997; Leyton, 2010; Sienkiewicz-Jarosz et al., 2013).”

    From Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation (2018) · cites this paper as Sienkiewicz-Jarosz et al., 2013

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 103

Authors
Sienkiewicz-Jarosz, H., Scinska, A., Swiecicki, L., Lipczynska-Lojkowska, W., Kuran, W., Ryglewicz, D., Kolaczkowski, M., Samochowiec, J., & Bienkowski, P.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology (PL)
  • Pomeranian Medical University (PL)
Venue
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
329
Issue
1-2
Pages
17-22
ISSN
0022-510X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981538661
Cited by
103
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Homo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology (33/10)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, taste pleasantness, sucrose, odor identification, taste perception, electrogustometry, reward systems, chemosensory perception, odor pleasantness
MeSH terms
Aged, Analysis of Variance, Antiparkinson Agents, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Food Preferences, Humans, Levodopa, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Smell, Sucrose, Sweetening Agents, Taste, Taste Threshold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review