Cited by 53Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchRisk Perception and ManagementBioethics and Human Rights Issues

Ethical framework on risk governance of synthetic biology

Open access
Bohua, Liao, Yuexin, Wang, Yakun, Ou, Kunlan, Zuo, Huan, Liu, Ruipeng, Lei·2023·Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity

Abstract

Synthetic biology is an emerging multidisciplinary field that aims to design and construct new biological systems not found in nature. Whereas synthetic biology may yield tremendous benefits, it may also pose substantial risks to human health and the environment that must be addressed. In this paper, we examined the environmental risks associated with synthetic biology, including changes to or depletion of the environment, competition with native species, horizontal gene transfer, pathogenicity or toxicity, bioterrorism, and laboratory biosecurity. We highlight three approaches for assessing environmental risks in synthetic biology: solution-focused risk assessment, Bayesian networks, and network of networks for sustainable capacity building. An ethical governance framework is proposed to facilitate innovation while minimising risks. This framework emphasises the precautionary principle and balancing stakeholder interests prior to project development and commercialisation. Overall, we underscore the importance and urgency of assessing and managing the environmental risks of synthetic biology to ensure its safe and ethical development and application.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jobb.2023.03.002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The introduction of synthetic and semi-synthetic microorganisms into the environment prompts ethical and cultural apprehensions, necessitating a balance between benefits and unintended consequences.

    “the introduction of synthetic and semi-synthetic microorganisms into the surroundings prompts ethical and cultural apprehensions, necessitating a balance between potential benefits and unintended consequences while also addressing public perception [43].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bohua, L., Yuexin, W., Yakun, O., Kunlan, Z., Huan, L., & Ruipeng, L.
Affiliations
Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Venue
Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-06
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
45-56
ISSN
2588-9338 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4362658874
Cited by
53
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2
FWCI
7.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Bioethics and Human Rights Issues
Keywords
synthetic biology, risk governance, environmental risk assessment, precautionary principle, horizontal gene transfer, bioterrorism, laboratory biosecurity, competition with native species, Bayesian networks, network of networks, stakeholder interests, commercialization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review