Cited by 431Salivary Gland Disorders and FunctionsOral microbiology and periodontitis researchHIV/AIDS oral health manifestations

Saliva as a diagnostic tool for oral and systemic diseases

Open access
Javaid, Mohammad A., Ahmed, Ahad S., Durand, Robert, Tran, Simon D.·2016·Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research

Abstract

Early disease detection is not only vital to reduce disease severity and prevent complications, but also critical to increase success rate of therapy. Saliva has been studied extensively as a potential diagnostic tool over the last decade due to its ease and non-invasive accessibility along with its abundance of biomarkers, such as genetic material and proteins. This review will update the clinician on recent advances in salivary biomarkers to diagnose autoimmune diseases (Sjogren's syndrome, cystic fibrosis), cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, HIV, oral cancer, caries and periodontal diseases. Considering their accuracy, efficacy, ease of use and cost effectiveness, salivary diagnostic tests will be available in dental offices. It is expected that the advent of sensitive and specific salivary diagnostic tools and the establishment of defined guidelines and results following rigorous testing will allow salivary diagnostics to be used as chair-side tests for several oral and systemic diseases in the near future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jobcr.2015.08.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because saliva can be readily collected, it has been used in connection to in vitro diagnostic biosensors on strips or portable device platforms.

    “Because saliva can be readily collected123-125, it has been used in connection to in vitro diagnostic biosensors on strips or portable device platforms,126-134.”

    From Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring (2019) · cites this paper as [123]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 431

Authors
Javaid, M. A., Ahmed, A. S., Durand, R., & Tran, S. D.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Tran, Simon D.
Venue
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
67-76
ISSN
2212-4268 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1655497889
Cited by
431
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 12
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › HIV/AIDS oral health manifestations
Keywords
saliva, salivary biomarkers, salivary diagnostics, non-invasive diagnosis, Sjögren's syndrome, cystic fibrosis, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, HIV, oral cancer, dental caries, periodontal disease, oral diseases, systemic disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review