Cited by 11Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchOrthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsTemporomandibular Joint Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cephalometry as an aid in the diagnosis of pediatric obstructive sleep apnoea: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
S, Shreya, Shetty, Vabitha, Priya, Krishna, Saha, Swagata, Jaswanth, Jyotsna, Sethi, Sneha·2024·Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research

Abstract

Background: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is part of a spectrum of sleep disorders causing snoring, gasping, and choking while sleeping. In children, OSA can also lead to behavioural issues, hyperactivity, and poor academic performance. Thus, early identification and management of OSA in children is crucial in preventing long-term health problems. The gold standard test for diagnosis is an overnight in-lab polysomnography (PSG). However, due to certain constraints associated with PSG, such as lack of accessibility, high expenses incurred, as well as the need for hospitalization, alternative diagnostic tools are needed. Cephalometry is a non-invasive, affordable diagnostic tool that may offer useful information in the evaluation of OSA. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the various cephalometric parameters associated with the diagnosis of OSA in children. Methods: A structured literature search was performed using the search engines PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google scholar from inception till July 2022. The weighted mean difference (z-test) was calculated using a random effects method (REM). Results: 16 studies were included in the review and meta-analysis was executed for each cephalometric parameter. The parameters of significance (p < 0.05) in Pediatric OSA with lower heterogeneity were associated with McNamara's and Linder-Aronson's analysis, the hyoid bone position, a retrognathic mandible, and an acute cranial base angle. Conclusions: Certain parameters in craniofacial morphology may be reliable diagnostic parameters. Further long-term studies are needed in order to shed more light in this area.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.06.007

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 1 Flowchart defining search strategy as per PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
Fig. 1 Flowchart defining search strategy as per PRISMA 2020 guidelines.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
S, S., Shetty, V., Priya, K., Saha, S., Jaswanth, J., & Sethi, S.
Affiliations
  • Nitte University (IN)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
Corresponding author
Shetty, Vabitha
Venue
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-09
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
512-521
ISSN
2212-4268 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400266738
Cited by
9
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Keywords
cephalometric analysis, craniofacial morphology, diagnostic parameters, McNamara analysis, hyoid bone position, retrognathic mandible

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review