Cited by 418Bone health and osteoporosis researchBody Composition Measurement TechniquesClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and Executive Summary of the 2007 ISCD Position Development Conference

Abstract

The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) convenes a Position Development Conference (PDC) every 2 yr to make recommendations for standards in the field of bone densitometry. The recommendations are based on clinically relevant issues in bone densitometry such as quality control, acquisition, analysis, interpretation and reporting. Topics for consideration are developed by the ISCD Board of Directors and its Scientific Advisory Committee. Clinically relevant questions related to each topic area are assigned to task forces for a comprehensive review of the medical literature and subsequent presentation of the reports to an international panel of experts. For this PDC, the Expert Panel included representatives of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, International Bone and Mineral Society and the National Osteoporosis Foundation. The recommendations of the PDC Expert Panel are then reviewed by the ISCD Board of Directors. Recommendations that are approved become Official Positions of the ISCD. The most recent PDC was held July 20-22, 2007, in Lansdowne, Virginia, USA. Topics considered included vertebral fracture assessment, technical and clinical issues relevant to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and bone densitometry technologies other than central DXA. This report describes the methodology and the results of the Lansdowne, Virginia, USA 2007 PDC, and a summary of all ISCD Official Positions, including the ones recently adopted by this P…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Lenchik, 2002, Executive summary International Society for Clinical Densitometry position development conference Denver, Colorado July 20–22, 2001, J Clin Densitom, 5, S1, 10.1385/JCD:5:3S:S01 · DOI
  2. The Writing Group for the ISCD Position Development Conference, 2004, 2004 Executive summary, J Clin Densitom, 7, 7
  3. The Writing Group for the ISCD Position Development Conference, 2004, Diagnosis of osteoporosis in men, premenopausal women and children, J Clin Densitom, 7, 17, 10.1385/JCD:7:1:17 · DOI
  4. The Writing Group for the ISCD Position Development Conference, 2004, Indications and reporting for dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, J Clin Densitom, 7, 37, 10.1385/JCD:7:1:37 · DOI
  5. The Writing Group for the ISCD Position Development Conference, 2004, Introduction, methods and participants, J Clin Densitom, 7, 13, 10.1385/JCD:7:1:13 · DOI
  6. The Writing Group for the ISCD Position Development Conference, 2004, Nomenclature and decimal places in bone densitometry, J Clin Densitom, 7, 45, 10.1385/JCD:7:1:45 · DOI
  7. Leib, 2004, Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, J Clin Densitom, 7, 1, 10.1385/JCD:7:1:1 · DOI
  8. The Writing Group for the ISCD Position Development Conference, 2004, Technical standardization for dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, J Clin Densitom, 7, 27, 10.1385/JCD:7:1:27 · DOI
  9. Leib, 2002, Position statements of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry: methodology, J Clin Densitom, 5, S5, 10.1385/JCD:5:3S:S05 · DOI
  10. Hamdy, 2002, Which central dual X-ray absorptiometry skeletal sites and regions of interest should be used to determine the diagnosis of osteoporosis?, J Clin Densitom, 5, S11, 10.1385/JCD:5:3S:S11 · DOI
  11. Binkley, 2002, What are the criteria by which a densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis can be made in males and non-Caucasians?, J Clin Densitom, 5, S19, 10.1385/JCD:5:3S:S19 · DOI
  12. Lenchik, 2002, What is the role of serial bone mineral density measurements in patient management?, J Clin Densitom, 5, S29, 10.1385/JCD:5:3S:S29 · DOI
  13. Miller, 2002, What are the standards by which bone mass measurement at peripheral skeletal sites should be used in the diagnosis of osteoporosis?, J Clin Densitom, 5, S39, 10.1385/JCD:5:3S:S39 · DOI
  14. Binkley, 2006, Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and executive summary of the 2005 Position Development Conference, J Clin Densitom, 9, 4, 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.002 · DOI
  15. Shepherd, 2006, Cross-calibration and minimum precisions standards for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions, J Clin Densitom, 9, 31, 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.005 · DOI
  16. Hans, 2006, Skeletal sites for osteoporosis diagnosis: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions, J Clin Densitom, 9, 15, 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.003 · DOI
  17. Leslie, 2006, Application of the 1994 WHO Classification to Populations other than postmenopausal Caucasian women: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions, J Clin Densitom, 9, 22, 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.004 · DOI
  18. Vokes, 2006, Vertebral fracture assessment: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions, J Clin Densitom, 9, 37, 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.006 · DOI
  19. Anonymous, 2002, Vol. 4.1.5

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Baim, S., Binkley, N., Bilezikian, J. P., Kendler, D. L., Hans, D. B., Lewiecki, E. M., & Silverman, S.
Affiliations
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
  • New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center (US)
Corresponding author
Baim, Sanford
Venue
Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
75-91
ISSN
1094-6950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4250875619
Cited by
418
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 37
FWCI
40.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Clinical Densitometry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Laboratory Technology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
bone densitometry, official positions, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quality control, vertebral fracture assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review