Cited by 281Bone health and osteoporosis researchHIV-related health complications and treatmentsBody Composition Measurement Techniques

Executive Summary of the 2015 ISCD Position Development Conference on Advanced Measures From DXA and QCT: Fracture Prediction Beyond BMD

Shepherd, John A., Schousboe, John T., Broy, Susan B., Engelke, Klaus, Leslie, William D.·2015·Journal of Clinical Densitometry

Abstract

There have been many scientific advances in fracture risk prediction beyond bone density. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) convened a Position Development Conference (PDC) on the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry beyond measurement of bone mineral density for fracture risk assessment, including trabecular bone score and hip geometry measures. Previously, no guidelines for nonbone mineral density DXA measures existed. Furthermore, there have been advances in the analysis of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) including finite element analysis, QCT of the hip, DXA-equivalent hip measurements, and opportunistic screening that were not included in the previous ISCD positions. The topics and questions for consideration were developed by the ISCD Board of Directors and the Scientific Advisory Committee and were designed to address the needs of clinical practitioners. Three task forces were created and asked to conduct comprehensive literature reviews to address specific questions. The task forces included participants from many countries and a variety of interests including academic institutions and private health care delivery organizations. Representatives from industry participated as consultants to the task forces. Task force reports with proposed position statements were then presented to an international panel of experts with backgrounds in bone densitometry. The PDC was held in Chicago, Illinois, USA, contemporaneously with the Annual Meeti…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jocd.2015.06.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shepherd, J. A., Schousboe, J. T., Broy, S. B., Engelke, K., & Leslie, W. D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science (US)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
Shepherd, John A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
274-286
ISSN
1094-6950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123301231
Cited by
281
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 3
FWCI
24.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Densitometry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › HIV-related health complications and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Keywords
fracture risk prediction, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, trabecular bone score, hip geometry, bone mineral density, finite element analysis, opportunistic screening, bone densitometry
MeSH terms
Humans, Osteoporosis, Societies, Medical, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Risk Assessment, Consensus, Fractures, Bone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review