Cited by 39Lattice Boltzmann Simulation StudiesRadiative Heat Transfer StudiesGas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory

A 3D Lattice Boltzmann method for light simulation in participating media

Mink, Albert, Thäter, Gudrun, Nirschl, Hermann, Krause, Mathias J.·2016·Journal of Computational Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jocs.2016.03.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 39

Authors
Mink, A., Thäter, G., Nirschl, H., & Krause, M. J.
Affiliations
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Corresponding author
Mink, Albert
Venue
Journal of Computational Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
17
Pages
431-437
ISSN
1877-7503 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2323971881
Cited by
39
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Computational Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Radiative Heat Transfer Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
Keywords
lattice Boltzmann method, radiative transfer equation, participating media, light scattering, Chapman-Enskog expansion, diffusion equation, grid convergence, mesh independence, error analysis, absorbing and scattering media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review