Cited by 36scientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetricsPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the citation lifecycle of papers with delayed recognition

Open access
Lachance, Christian, Larivière, Vincent·2014·Journal of Informetrics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.joi.2014.08.002

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For medicine and science papers, although most citations are received within five years after publication, a paper could be cited 30+ years after publication.

    “Lachance and Larivière (2014) mentioned that for medicine and science papers, although most of the citations were received within five years after publication, a paper could be cited 30+ years after publication.”

    From Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine (2021) · cites this paper as Lachance and Larivière (2014)

    The Conclusion (page unavailable) describes a typical citation profile that peaks two or three years after publication and then declines, while the Discussion follows citations through years 30–37. The Disciplinary differences section includes medicine and science, but no passage establishes that most citations to papers in those fields are received within five years. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lachance, C., & Larivière, V.
Affiliations
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Lachance, Christian
Venue
Journal of Informetrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
863-872
ISSN
1751-1577 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084394153
Cited by
36
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Informetrics (publishedVersion)
  • Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
delayed recognition, citation patterns, Sleeping Beauty, citation growth, disciplinary differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review