Cited by 58scientometrics and bibliometrics researchPsychology Research and BibliometricsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Sampling Issues in Bibliometric Analysis

Open access
Williams, Richard, Bornmann, Lutz·2016·Journal of Informetrics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.joi.2015.11.004

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Levy, P., & Lemeshow, S. (2008). Sampling of population -methods and applications (4 ed.). New York, NY, USA: Wiley.
  2. Schneider, J. (2012). Testing university rankings statistically: why this is not such a good idea after all. Some reflections on statistical power, effect sizes, random sampling and imaginary populations. In E. Archambault, Y. Gingras & V. Lariviere (Eds.), The 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 719-732). Montreal, Canada: Repro-UQAM.
  3. StataCorp. (2013). Stata power and sample size reference manual Release 13. College Station, Texas: Stata Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, R., & Bornmann, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Williams, Richard
Venue
Journal of Informetrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
1225-1232
ISSN
1751-1577 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1847453300
Cited by
58
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Informetrics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
citation data, sample size determination, power analysis, statistical inference, significance testing, confidence intervals, effect size, research resources

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review