Cited by 225scientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetricsLibrary Science and Information Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of Science

Open access

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.joi.2016.07.003

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 35 references

3 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Moed, 2005, Vol. 9
  2. Scopus Elsevier, 2016

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–225 of 225

Metadata

Authors
Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L.
Affiliations
Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Corresponding author
Franceschini, Fiorenzo
Venue
Journal of Informetrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
933-953
ISSN
1751-1577 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2520427567
Cited by
225
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
14.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Informetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information Systems
Keywords
Scopus, Web of Science, error classification, citation indexing, database accuracy, bibliometric databases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review