The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of Science
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5 · Cited by 5,274
(2015) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400873364-029 · Cited by 2,581
Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A Longitudinal and Cross-Disciplinary Comparison
Harzing, A.-W., & Alakangas, S. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9 · Cited by 1,784
Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20677 · Cited by 974
Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus
Archambault, É., Campbell, D., Gingras, Y., & Larivière, V. (2009) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21062 · Cited by 833
Wang, Q., & Waltman, L. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.003 · Cited by 417
The impact-factors debate: the ISI's uses and limits
Moed, H. F. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415731a · Cited by 289
The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation
Falagas, M. E., & Alexiou, V. G. (2008) · Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis · doi:10.1007/s00005-008-0024-5 · Cited by 262
Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (Information Science & Knowledge Management)
Moed, H. F. (2005) · Springer eBooks · Cited by 206
A new methodology for comparing Google Scholar and Scopus
Moed, H. F., Bar‐Ilan, J., & Halevi, G. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.04.017 · Cited by 159
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Moed, 2005, Vol. 9
- Scopus Elsevier, 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World
Pranckutė, R. (2021) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications9010012 · Cited by 2,696
Marzi, G., Balzano, M., Caputo, A., & Pellegrini, M. M. (2024) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12381 · Cited by 831
Supply chain resilience: A review, conceptual framework and future research
Shishodia, A., Sharma, R., Rajesh, R., & Munim, Z. H. (2021) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijlm-03-2021-0169 · Cited by 275
The Data Source of This Study Is Web of Science Core Collection? Not Enough
Liu, W. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03238-1 · Cited by 221
Verrall, B., & Pickering, C. M. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141344 · Cited by 223
Metadata
- Authors
- Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L.
- Affiliations
- Politecnico di Torino (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Franceschini, Fiorenzo
- Venue
- Journal of Informetrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 933-953
- ISSN
- 1751-1577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2520427567
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 14.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Informetrics (publishedVersion)
- PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information Systems
- Keywords
- Scopus, Web of Science, error classification, citation indexing, database accuracy, bibliometric databases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
