The Data Source of This Study Is Web of Science Core Collection? Not Enough
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Institutions mostly subscribe to only WoS CC instead of the whole WoS Platform due to the possibility to adjust subscription of WoS DB.
“Institutions mostly subscribe to only WoS CC instead of the whole WoS Platform due to the possibility to adjust subscription of WoS DB [29].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
The exact composition of WoS DB indexes and time-frame limitations were often not clearly stated in studies.
“Especially for the reason that the exact composition of WoS DB indexes and time-frame limitations were often not clearly stated in the studies [29].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
The composition of WoS CC and the extent of actually accessible content for users of a particular institution may differ significantly from the one described by the owner.
“the composition of WoS CC and the extent of actually accessible content for users of particular institution may differ significantly from the one described by the owner”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
Cites
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 · Cited by 21,484 · see citing works
Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Holzmeister, F., Ho, T.-H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Nave, G., Nosek, B. A., Pfeiffer, T., et al. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z · Cited by 1,521 · see citing works
Li, K., Rollins, J. E., & Yan, E. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2622-5 · Cited by 740 · see citing works
Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management
Ràfols, I., Porter, A. L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21368 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories
Leydesdorff, L., Carley, S. F., & Ràfols, I. (2012) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0784-8 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Empirical Analysis and Classification of Database Errors in Scopus and Web of Science
Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.07.003 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Liu, W. (2016) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1002/leap.1089 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Self-citationBecoming Metric-Wise: A Bibliometric Guide for Researchers
Egghe, L., Guns, R., & Rousseau, R. (2018) · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Temporal characteristics of retracted articles
Bar-Ilan, J., & Halevi, G. (2018) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2802-y · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Lei, L., & Zhang, Y. W. (2017) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9962-7 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Funding Acknowledgment Analysis: Queries and Caveats
Tang, L., Hu, G., & Liu, W. (2017) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23713 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Self-citationMissing Author Address Information in Web of Science—An Explorative Study
Liu, W., Hu, G., & Tang, L. (2018) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.07.008 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationTang, L. (2013) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.11.010 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Pathogenic organization in science: Division of labor and retractions
Walsh, J. P., Lee, Y.-N., & Tang, L. (2019) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.004 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
DOI errors and possible solutions for Web of Science
Zhu, J., Hu, G., & Liu, W. (2018) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2980-7 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationBerg, J. M. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar8654 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Missing author address information in Web of Science—An explorative study
Liu, W., Hu, G., & Tang, L. (2018) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationRetraction and Research Integrity Education in China
Hu, G., Yang, Y., & Tang, L. (2018) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-017-0017-x · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Variable Bibliographic Database Access Could Limit Reproducibility
Dallas, T., Gehman, A.-L., & Farrell, M. J. (2018) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biy074 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
(2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2017-0-01828-1 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World
Pranckutė, R. (2021) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications9010012 · Cited by 2,696 · see citing works
Funding Information in Web of Science: An Updated Overview
Liu, W., Tang, L., & Hu, G. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03362-3 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Liu, W.
- Affiliations
- Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Weishu
- ORCID
- Liu, Weishu
- Venue
- Scientometrics
- Published
- 2019-09-23
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1815-1824
- ISSN
- 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2861
- OpenAlex
- W2977083636
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13
- FWCI
- 8.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Keywords
- Web of Science Core Collection, reproducibility, Clarivate Analytics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
