The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of author-selected keywords on citation counts
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus, citation-based impact indicators tend to create bias amongst authors not only when choosing journal for publishing, but also when choosing which literature to cite [268,273-275].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [275]
In the citing paper
“journal impact indicators influence citing behavior, firstly because impact factors increase the visibility of the paper based on an assumption that journals with higher impact indicators publish papers of a higher scientific value.”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [275]
In the citing paper
“In turn, papers that are published in high quality journals are cited more frequently.”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [275]
Citations
Cites
Discovering Statistics Using SPSS
Field, A. P., & Miles, J. N. V. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 28,269
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S. S., & Faust, K. (1994) · Cited by 18,005
An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output
Hirsch, J. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102 · Cited by 11,669
Flesch, R. (1948) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0057532 · Cited by 5,391
Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf · Cited by 5,039
The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network over 32 Years
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa066082 · Cited by 5,007
The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations
Kaplan, N. M., Merton, R. Κ., & Storer, N. W. (1974) · Technology and Culture · doi:10.2307/3102264 · Cited by 4,030
The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor
Garfield, E. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.1.90 · Cited by 2,770
Theory and practise of the g-index
Egghe, L. (2006) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7 · Cited by 2,354
Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior
(2016) · Studies in information · doi:10.1108/s2055-53772016 · Cited by 1,537
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World
Pranckutė, R. (2021) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications9010012 · Cited by 2,696
Tripathi, M., Kumar, S., Sonker, S. K., & Babbar, P. (2018) · Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management · doi:10.1080/09737766.2018.1436951 · Cited by 144
How do authors select keywords? A preliminary study of author keyword selection behavior
Lu, W. P., Liu, Z., Huang, Y., Bu, Y., Li, X., & Cheng, Q. (2020) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2020.101066 · Cited by 141
Virtual reality for assessing visual quality and lighting perception: A systematic review
Bellazzi, A., Bellia, L., Chinazzo, G., Corbisiero, F., D’Agostino, P., Devitofrancesco, A., Fragliasso, F., Ghellere, M., Megale, V., & Salamone, F. (2021) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108674 · Cited by 124
Detecting research topic trends by author-defined keyword frequency
Lu, W. P., Huang, S., Yang, J., Bu, Y., Cheng, Q., & Huang, Y. (2021) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102594 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Uddin, S., & Khan, A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Uddin, Shahadat
- Venue
- Journal of Informetrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1166-1177
- ISSN
- 1751-1577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2538658056
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 7.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Informetrics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Keywords
- citation counts, keyword co-occurrence network, network centrality, degree centrality, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
