Cited by 2,770scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Writing and PublishingPublishing and Scholarly Communication

The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor

Garfield, Eugene·2006·JAMA

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.295.1.90

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garfield, E.
Corresponding author
Garfield, Eugene
Venue
JAMA
Published
2006-01-04
Volume
295
Issue
1
Pages
90
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2132631086
Cited by
2,770
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 110 · 2025: 152 · 2024: 133 · 2023: 139 · 2022: 150 · 2021: 181 · 2020: 141 · 2019: 155 · 2018: 145 · 2017: 169 · 2016: 164 · 2015: 161 · 2014: 134 · 2013: 135 · 2012: 162
FWCI
115.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Keywords
journal impact factor, bibliometric analysis, journal evaluation, citation analysis
MeSH terms
Periodicals as Topic, Bibliometrics, Peer Review, Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review