The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Disentangling leanness and agility: An empirical investigation
Abstract
Manufacturing plant managers have sought performance improvements by adhering to the guiding principles of leanness and agility. Lean manufacturing and agile manufacturing paradigms have also received considerable attention in operations management literature. However, paradoxically, the extant literature is lacking in clarity and fails to delineate with sufficient precision how and why leanness and agility differ. Given the resource constraints within which most manufacturing firms have to operate today, it is useful, if not critical, to develop a good understanding of how these paradigms differ and what their constituent dimensions are. Such an understanding is also essential for developing and testing theories relating to leanness and agility. Through a literature review we discuss leanness and agility in two ways: (1) as manufacturing paradigms and (2) as performance capabilities. Our empirical study attempts to determine whether lean and agile forms occur with any degree of regularity in manufacturing plants. The results confirm the existence of homogeneous groups that resemble lean and agile performing plants, and they identify important differences pertaining to their constituent performance dimensions. The results indicate that while the pursuit of agility might presume leanness, pursuit of leanness might not presume agility. While the performance capability differences across the empirically derived groups accord well with expected differences across plants that excel in leanness and agility, the practice differences across the groups are not as clearly distinguished. We discuss the implications of our findings for further research and theory development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance
Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(02)00108-0 · Cited by 2,897
McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256489 · Cited by 1,704
de Treville, S., & Antonakis, J. (2006) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.04.001 · Cited by 549
Cited by
Defining and developing measures of lean production
Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.019 · Cited by 2,399
Lean manufacturing: literature review and research issues
Bhamu, J., & Singh Sangwan, K. (2014) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-08-2012-0315 · Cited by 983
The impact of internal integration and relationship commitment on external integration
Zhao, X., Huo, B., Selen, W., & Yeung, J. H. Y. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.04.004 · Cited by 813
The mass customization decade: An updated review of the literature
Fogliatto, F. S., da Silveira, G. J. C., & Borenstein, D. (2012) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.002 · Cited by 710
Fullerton, R. R., Kennedy, F. A., & Widener, S. K. (2014) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2014.09.002 · Cited by 407
Metadata
- Authors
- Narasimhan, R., Swink, M., & Kim, S. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01-19
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 440-457
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W2116436394
- Cited by
- 680
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 30.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disentangling leanness and agility: An empirical investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jom.2005.11.011
- The paper
- Narasimhan, R., Swink, M., & Kim, S. W. (2006). Disentangling leanness and agility: An empirical investigation. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.11.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.