RESEARCH NOTES. DISTRIBUTIVE AND PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AS PREDICTORS OF SATISFACTION WITH PERSONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL OUTCOMES.
Abstract
Distributive justice was found to be a more important predictor of two personal outcomes, pay satisfaction and job satisfaction, than procedural justice, whereas the reverse was true for two organi...
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A confirmatory Harman's one-factor test showed the single-factor model had significantly worse fit than the proposed 19-factor model (χ2 diff = 1,232.33; df diff = 170; p ≤ 0.01).
“Results showed that the single-factor model had a significantly worse fit (χ 2 diff = 1,232.33;df diff = 170; p ≤ 0.01).”
From On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism (2014) · cites this paper as McFarlin and Sweeney, 1992
Cites
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102 · see citing works
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988) · Critical Issues in Social Justice · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4 · Cited by 6,585 · see citing works
Distributive and procedural justice in the workplace
Folger, R. (1987) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/bf01048013 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 · Cited by 5,942 · see citing works
Schilke, O. (2014) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2099 · Cited by 1,264 · see citing works
Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments
van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(02)80003-x · Cited by 913 · see citing works
Organizational learning capability: A proposal of measurement
Jerez-Gómez, P., Céspedes-Lorente, J., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2005) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.11.002 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
Newman, D. T., Fast, N. J., & Harmon, D. J. (2020) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.03.008 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
Linking justice, trust and innovative work behaviour to work engagement
A. Agarwal, U. (2014) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-02-2012-0019 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
VOICE, CONTROL, AND BELONGING: The Double-Edged Sword of Procedural Fairness
MacCoun, R. J. (2005) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115958 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Janssen, O., Lam, C. K., & Huang, X. (2010) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.614 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Narayanan, S., Jayaraman, V., Luo, Y., & Swaminathan, J. M. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.05.001 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Wang, C., Teo, T. S. H., & Janssen, M. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102401 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Servant leadership and commitment to change, the mediating role of justice and optimism
Kool, M., & van Dierendonck, D. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/09534811211228139 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
APPLYING UNCERTAINTY MANAGEMENT THEORY TO EMPLOYEE VOICE BEHAVIOR: AN INTEGRATIVE INVESTIGATION
TAKEUCHI, R., CHEN, Z., & CHEUNG, S. Y. (2012) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01247.x · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Peetz, J., & Grossmann, I. (2021) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550620931985 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D.
- Affiliations
- Marquette University (US)
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1992-08-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 626-637
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2084567880
- Cited by
- 1,704
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 102 · 2014: 103 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 81
- FWCI
- 24.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- distributive justice, procedural justice, pay satisfaction, job satisfaction, individual outcomes, organizational outcomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
