The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Japanese production management: An evolution—With mixed success
Abstract
Japanese production management (JPM) became a dominant influence in the field of operations management when, in the early 1980s, knowledge of its main elements became known beyond Japan. Those elements – quick set‐up, small lots, cells, kanban, and so on – are well known. Rather than explaining them again, this paper's objective is to explore the sequence of events leading to JPM as a competitive force globally, as well as its impact on theory and practices in operations management. JPM's evolution includes shifting terminologies, fusions and adulterations; limited extensions from manufacturing into services and innovative enhancements, largely of Western origin. Longitudinal research data, based on inventory trends, provide insights on JPM's diffusions and its uneven results. Latter‐day puzzling lapses and disappointments, among Japanese as well as Western companies, raise questions about JPM's sustainability, as well as some of its changing manifestations. While the core of Japanese production management, now over three decades old, appears to have become solidly mainstream, its current and future states are problematic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Successful lean implementation: Organizational culture and soft lean practices
Bortolotti, T., Boscari, S., & Danese, P. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.013 · Cited by 678
Lean practices and their effect on performance: a literature review
Negrão, L. L. L., Godinho Filho, M., & Marodin, G. (2016) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2016.1231853 · Cited by 243
Samuel, D., Found, P., & Williams, S. J. (2015) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-12-2013-0555 · Cited by 146
Goshime, Y., Kitaw, D., & Jilcha, K. (2019) · International Journal of Lean Six Sigma · doi:10.1108/ijlss-06-2017-0063 · Cited by 112
Cadden, T., Millar, K., Treacy, R., & Humphreys, P. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107744 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Schonberger, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05-19
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 403-419
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W2129380610
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Japanese production management: An evolution—With mixed success. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jom.2006.04.003
- The paper
- Schonberger, R. J. (2007). Japanese production management: An evolution—With mixed success. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.04.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.