Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Use of Coffee to Decrease the Incidence of Postoperative Ileus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Kane, Terri D., Tubog, Tito D., Schmidt, James R.·2020·Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing
DOI 10.1016/j.jopan.2019.07.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jopan.2019.07.004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Behm, 2003, Postoperative ileus: Etiologies and interventions, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 1, 71, 10.1053/cgh.2003.50012 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Venara, 2016, Postoperative ileus: Pathophysiology, incidence, and prevention, J Visc Surg, 153, 439
  3. Luckey, 2003, Mechanisms and treatment of postoperative ileus, Arch Surg, 138, 206, 10.1001/archsurg.138.2.206 · DOI
  4. Fanning, 2011, Safety and efficacy of immediate postoperative feeding and bowel stimulation to prevent ileus after major gynecologic surgical procedures, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 111, 469
  5. Boelens, 2014, Reduction of postoperative ileus by early enteral nutrition in patients undergoing major rectal surgery: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial, Ann Surg, 259, 649, 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000288 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Rees, 2017, Delayed postoperative diet is associated with a greater incidence of prolonged postoperative ileus and longer stay in hospital for patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery, Nutr Diet, 75, 24, 10.1111/1747-0080.12369 · DOI
  7. Ortiz, 1996, Early postoperative feeding after elective colorectal surgery is not a benefit unique to laparoscopy-assisted procedures, Int J Colorectal Dis, 11, 246, 10.1007/s003840050055 · DOI
  8. Müller, 2012, Randomized clinical trial on the effect of coffee on postoperative ileus following elective colectomy, Br J Surg, 99, 1530, 10.1002/bjs.8885 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Dulskas, 2015, Effect of coffee on the length of postoperative ileus after elective laparoscopic left-sided colectomy, Dis Colon Rectum, 58, 1064, 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000449 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Piric, 2015, The effects of drinking coffee while recovering from colon and rectal resection surgery, Med Arch, 69, 357, 10.5455/medarh.2015.69.357-361 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Güngördük, 2017, Effects of coffee consumption on gut recovery after surgery of gynecological cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 216, 145.e1, 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.019 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Rabiepoor, 2018, Does coffee affect the bowel function after caesarean section?, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 220, 96, 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.028 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Goymen, 2017, Effect of gum chewing and coffee consumption on intestinal motility in caesarean sections, J Clin Analyt Med, 8, 411
  14. Moher, 2009, Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement, J Clin Epidemiol, 62, 1006, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Wan, 2014, Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range, BMC Med Res Methodol, 14, 135, 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Senagore, 2007, Pathogenesis and clinical and economic consequences of postoperative ileus, Am J Health Syst Pharm, 64, S3, 10.2146/ajhp070428 · DOI
  17. Cheatham, 1995, A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy, Ann Surg, 221, 469, 10.1097/00000658-199505000-00004 · DOI
  18. Sagar, 1992, Nasogastric intubation and elective abdominal surgery, Br J Surg, 79, 1127, 10.1002/bjs.1800791105 · DOI
  19. Abd-El-Maeboud, 2009, Gum chewing stimulates early return of bowel motility after caesarean section, BJOG, 116, 1334, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02225.x · DOI
  20. Ledari, 2012, Chewing gums has stimulatory effects on bowel function in patients undergoing cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial, Bosn J Basic Med Sci, 12, 265, 10.17305/bjbms.2012.2452 · DOI
  21. Vásquez, 2008, Is gum chewing useful for ileus after elective colorectal surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, J Gastro Surg, 13, 649, 10.1007/s11605-008-0756-8 · DOI
  22. Zhu, 2014, Effects of gum chewing on postoperative bowel motility after caesarean section: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, BJOG, 121, 787, 10.1111/1471-0528.12662 · DOI
  23. Craciunas, 2014, Chewing gum in preventing postoperative ileus in women undergoing caesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, BJOG, 121, 793, 10.1111/1471-0528.12696 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kane, T. D., Tubog, T. D., & Schmidt, J. R.
Venue
Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
171-177.e1
ISSN
1089-9472
DOI
10.1016/j.jopan.2019.07.004
Cited by
18
References
2
Language
en
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.