Cited by 3Dental Implant Techniques and OutcomesOral health in cancer treatmentReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques

Dental rehabilitation in irradiated oral cancer patients using patient-specific dental implants – Clinical outcome and oral health-related quality of life

Jehn, Philipp, Korn, Philippe, Spalthoff, Simon, Schiller, Marcus, Lentge, Fritjof, Bolstorff, Inga, Tavassol, Frank, Gellrich, Nils-Claudius +1 more·2024·Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Abstract

Introduction Dental rehabilitation in oral cancer patients is essential for good oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Patient-specific dental implants are suitable for treating tumor-related bony defects, resulting in satisfactory OHRQoL. However, knowledge concerning the clinical outcome and OHRQoL following tumor irradiation is lacking.Material and methods A retrospective analysis was carried out to evaluate clinical outcomes and OHRQoL in eight patients who received patient-specific dental implants and implant-supported dentures after surgical treatment for oral cancer with additional irradiation. OHRQoL assessment was performed using the German long version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP) questionnaire (OHIP-G53).Results Clinical examination revealed successful dental rehabilitation in all the patients with only minor impairments. Restricted stability and function of implants were not observed. OHIP sum-scores of all the patients indicated acceptable OHRQoL, but this varied between patients treated in the upper or lower jaw. Single-item sum-scores concerning the adverse events "difficulty in chewing," "food catching," "sore jaw," "sore spots," and "unclear speech" were detected to be the worst, and pain-related OHIP dimensions demonstrated the highest scores (followed by functional limitation, physical disability, and psychosocial impact) with a worse OHRQoL following lower jaw treatment. Other dimension sum-scores were overall lower and nearly equally distributed in patients.Conclusions Dental rehabilitation of irradiated oral cancer patients using patient-specific dental implants may be suitable, leading to acceptable OHRQoL. However, implant insertion in the upper jaw seems to be more favorable. Further studies on patient-specific dental implants are warranted to validate the current results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101674

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 3

Authors
Jehn, P., Korn, P., Spalthoff, S., Schiller, M., Lentge, F., Bolstorff, I., Tavassol, F., Gellrich, N.-C., & Rahlf, B.
Affiliations
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
Corresponding author
Jehn, Philipp
Venue
Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-04
Volume
125
Issue
2
Pages
101674
ISSN
2468-7855 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388076076
Cited by
3
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Oral health in cancer treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Keywords
oral cancer, dental rehabilitation, oral health-related quality of life, implant-supported dentures, implant stability
MeSH terms
Humans, Mandible, Mouth Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Retrospective Studies, Dental Implants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review