Dental rehabilitation in irradiated oral cancer patients using patient-specific dental implants – Clinical outcome and oral health-related quality of life
Abstract
Introduction Dental rehabilitation in oral cancer patients is essential for good oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Patient-specific dental implants are suitable for treating tumor-related bony defects, resulting in satisfactory OHRQoL. However, knowledge concerning the clinical outcome and OHRQoL following tumor irradiation is lacking.Material and methods A retrospective analysis was carried out to evaluate clinical outcomes and OHRQoL in eight patients who received patient-specific dental implants and implant-supported dentures after surgical treatment for oral cancer with additional irradiation. OHRQoL assessment was performed using the German long version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP) questionnaire (OHIP-G53).Results Clinical examination revealed successful dental rehabilitation in all the patients with only minor impairments. Restricted stability and function of implants were not observed. OHIP sum-scores of all the patients indicated acceptable OHRQoL, but this varied between patients treated in the upper or lower jaw. Single-item sum-scores concerning the adverse events "difficulty in chewing," "food catching," "sore jaw," "sore spots," and "unclear speech" were detected to be the worst, and pain-related OHIP dimensions demonstrated the highest scores (followed by functional limitation, physical disability, and psychosocial impact) with a worse OHRQoL following lower jaw treatment. Other dimension sum-scores were overall lower and nearly equally distributed in patients.Conclusions Dental rehabilitation of irradiated oral cancer patients using patient-specific dental implants may be suitable, leading to acceptable OHRQoL. However, implant insertion in the upper jaw seems to be more favorable. Further studies on patient-specific dental implants are warranted to validate the current results.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients' oral health-related quality of life after dental rehabilitation with IPS Implants® Preprosthetic was evaluated in prior studies and could be proven equally to those with conventional dental implants.
“Patients oral health-related quality of life after dental rehabilitation with IPS Implants® Preprosthetic was evaluated in prior studies and could be proven equally to those with conventional dental implants [23, 24].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 3
- Authors
- Jehn, P., Korn, P., Spalthoff, S., Schiller, M., Lentge, F., Bolstorff, I., Tavassol, F., Gellrich, N.-C., & Rahlf, B.
- Affiliations
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Jehn, Philipp
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-04
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 101674
- ISSN
- 2468-7855 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4388076076
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Oral health in cancer treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
- Keywords
- oral cancer, dental rehabilitation, oral health-related quality of life, implant-supported dentures, implant stability
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Mandible, Mouth Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Retrospective Studies, Dental Implants
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review