The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical Parameters for Evaluating Coin Cells and Pouch Cells of Rechargeable Li-Metal Batteries
Open accessAbstract
Summary Lithium (Li)-metal batteries have regained broad interest in the battery research community. Although many studies on Li anode have been published in recent years, it is difficult to evaluate and compare these advances for practical applications. A key challenge is a gap between materials and component properties and the achievable large-format cell-level performance. In this paper, we investigate the critical experimental parameters that determine the cycle number of coin cells to understand the performance variations reported in the literature. To define the range of cell parameters, we exemplify a representative Li-metal pouch cell with specific energy of 300 Wh/kg to provide an effective validation of electrode materials and accurate cell performance evaluations. Based on the pouch-cell-level requirements, we propose a set of coin-cell parameters and testing conditions to expedite the discovery of new materials and their full integration into realistic battery systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
High rate and stable cycling of lithium metal anode
Qian, J., Henderson, W. A., Xu, W., Bhattacharya, P., Engelhard, M., Borodin, O., & Zhang, J.-G. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7362 · Cited by 2,561
Self-citation
Cited by
Rechargeable Batteries for Grid Scale Energy Storage
Zhu, Z., Jiang, T., Ali, M., Meng, Y., Jin, Y., Cui, Y., & Chen, W. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00289 · Cited by 1,769
Mitigating Thermal Runaway of Lithium-Ion Batteries
Feng, X., Ren, D., He, X., & Ouyang, M. (2020) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2020.02.010 · Cited by 1,735
Practical Evaluation of Li-Ion Batteries
Li, H. (2019) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2019.03.028 · Cited by 420
Chen, H., Yang, Y., Boyle, D. T., Jeong, Y. K., Xu, R., de Vasconcelos, L. S., Huang, Z., Wang, H., Wang, H., Huang, W., et al. (2021) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-021-00833-6 · Cited by 409
Zhang, W., Lu, J., & Guo, Z. (2021) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2021.03.015 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, S., Niu, C., Lee, H., Li, Q., Yu, L., Xu, W., Zhang, J.-G., Dufek, E. J., Whittingham, M. S., Meng, S., Xiao, J., & Liu, J.
- Venue
- Joule
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1094-1105
- ISSN
- 2542-4351 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2916955754
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical Parameters for Evaluating Coin Cells and Pouch Cells of Rechargeable Li-Metal Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.joule.2019.02.004
- The paper
- Chen, S., Niu, C., Lee, H., Li, Q., Yu, L., Xu, W., Zhang, J.-G., Dufek, E. J., Whittingham, M. S., Meng, S., Xiao, J., & Liu, J. (2019). Critical Parameters for Evaluating Coin Cells and Pouch Cells of Rechargeable Li-Metal Batteries. Joule. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.02.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
