Cited by 146Energy Efficiency and ManagementClimate Change Policy and EconomicsIron and Steelmaking Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing the potential of decarbonization options for industrial sectors

Open access

Abstract

Industry emits around a quarter of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This paper presents the first comprehensive review to identify the main decarbonization options for this sector and their abatement potentials. First, we identify the important GHG emitting processes and establish a global average baseline for their current emissions intensity and energy use. We then quantify the energy and emissions reduction potential of the most significant abatement options, as well as their technology readiness level (TRL). We find that energy-intensive industries have a range of decarbonization technologies available with medium to high TRLs, and mature options also exist for decarbonizing low-temperature heat across a wide range of industrial sectors. However, electrification and novel process change options to reduce emissions from high-temperature and sector-specific processes have much lower TRLs in comparison. We conclude by highlighting important barriers to the deployment of industrial decarbonization options and identifying future research, development, and demonstration needs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.joule.2024.01.007

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Furszyfer Del Rio, 2022, Decarbonizing the glass industry: A critical and systematic review of developments, sociotechnical systems and policy options, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 155, 111885, 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111885 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–146 of 146

Metadata

Authors
Gailani, A., Cooper, S., Allen, S., Pimm, A., Taylor, P., & Gross, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • UK Energy Research Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Gailani, Ahmed
Venue
Joule
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
576-603
ISSN
2542-4351 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391406497
Cited by
146
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 15
FWCI
9.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Joule (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Natural Environment Research Council
  • UK Research and Innovation
  • UK Energy Research Centre
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/R035288/1, EP/S029575/1)
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy Efficiency and Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Metals and Alloys › Iron and Steelmaking Processes
Keywords
industrial decarbonization, greenhouse gas emissions, technology readiness level, energy-intensive industries, low-temperature heat, electrification, process change, high-temperature processes, emission intensity, energy consumption, deployment barriers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review