Cited by 34Ovarian function and disordersGenetic and Kidney Cyst DiseasesReproductive Biology and Fertility

The Role of Ovarian Volume As a Diagnostic Criterion for Chinese Adolescents with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Chen, Yaxiao, Yang, Dongzi, Li, Lin, Chen, Xiaoli·2008·Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology

Abstract

Background This study revisited the ovarian volume (OV) as one of the diagnostic criteria for Chinese adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unknown whether the threshold of 10 cm(3) for the OV, chosen at the PCOS international consensus in 2003, was optimal for Chinese PCOS adolescents or not.Methods 69 adolescent PCOS patients and 26 controls were involved in this study. Ultrasound examination was performed between cycle days 2 and 7 or at random with a 6-MHz transvaginal transducer. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis was mainly used for statistical analysis.Results Mean OV and maximum OV were significantly larger in PCOS group than that in controls. The area under the ROC curve was >0.8 for both criteria, indicating a satisfactory diagnostic potency. The two criteria had no statistical difference in diagnostic potency. Setting the threshold of mean OV at 6.74 cm(3) offered the best compromise between specificity (92.3%) and sensitivity (75.4%) and setting the threshold of maximum OV at 7.82 cm(3) offered the best compromise between specificity (88.5%) and sensitivity (73.9%).Conclusions OV yields good diagnostic accuracy to distinguish normal ovaries from polycystic ovaries in Chinese adolescents, but for Chinese PCOS adolescents, the best compromise between sensitivity and specificity was obtained with a threshold set at 6.74 cm(3) for mean ovarian volume and at 7.82 cm(3) for maximum ovarian volume instead of the 10 cm(3) threshold proposed by the Rotterdam consensus conference based on general PCOS patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpag.2008.01.081

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One level III3 case-control study with moderate risk of bias was identified by our search to answer the question, and was deemed insufficient evidence on which to base a recommendation.

    “One level III3 case-control study with moderate risk of bias 73 was identified by our search to answer the question, and was deemed insufficient evidence on which to base a recommendation.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, Y., Yang, D., Li, L., & Chen, X.
Affiliations
Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Venue
Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
347-350
ISSN
  • 0932-8610 (ISSN-L)
  • 1083-3188
OpenAlex
W2035780799
Cited by
34
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, ovarian volume, adolescents, diagnostic thresholds, diagnostic accuracy, transvaginal ultrasound, Chinese adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, China, Female, Humans, Organ Size, Ovary, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Sensitivity and Specificity, Ultrasonography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review