Cited by 88Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Knowledge of the female athlete Triad, and prevalence of Triad risk factors among female high school athletes and their coaches

Brown, Katie N., Wengreen, Heidi J., Beals, Katherine A.·2014·Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology

Abstract

Study objective This study aimed to determine awareness/knowledge of the Triad and its health implications among female high school athletes and their coaches, and to evaluate coaches' Triad screening/intervention practices. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting Two high schools in the western United States. Participants Female athletes from a variety of sports (N = 240) ages 14-18 years and their coaches (N = 10). Intervention Participants completed surveys that assessed Triad knowledge and athlete Triad risk factors. Main outcome measures Frequency of responses to Triad knowledge, Triad risk factor, and Triad education/screening procedures questions; athlete summative knowledge score. Results Half (N = 120) of participants reported menstrual irregularity, and 42% (N = 101) had 2 or more Triad risk factors: past amenorrhea (N = 39), past stress fracture (N = 41), self-reported not eating enough (N = 53), underweight (BMI-for-age 10 pounds when self-reported weight was in a healthy range (N = 34). Average athlete Triad knowledge score was 2.97 ± 1.61 out of 8. Coach Triad knowledge was limited; however, most (9/10) were comfortable discussing menstruation with their athletes. Barriers to Triad screening/education were coaches' insufficient time, knowledge, and educational resources. Conclusion Triad risk factors were prevalent among athletes and coach and athlete Triad knowledge was low. Providing coaches with Triad screening/education training may increase Triad knowledge a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpag.2013.11.014

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, K. N., Wengreen, H. J., & Beals, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Utah State University (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Wengreen, Heidi J.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
278-282
ISSN
  • 0932-8610 (ISSN-L)
  • 1083-3188
OpenAlex
W2147502097
Cited by
88
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
female athlete triad, menstrual irregularity, amenorrhea, stress fractures, disordered eating, coaches, high school athletes, coach knowledge, barriers to screening
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cross-Sectional Studies, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Risk Factors, United States, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Female Athlete Triad Syndrome, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review