Pain and Attention: Attentional Disruption or Distraction?
Open accessAbstract
Unlabelled The effect of pain processing on attention capacity during visual search was examined in 2 experiments. In the first experiment, we investigated whether pain draws on the same limited resources as attentional task performance. It was hypothesized that pain would negatively affect task performance under different load manipulations. Low and high load conditions of a visual search task were presented in a mixed design combined with a painfully cold or neutral cold pressor test. Performance was not affected by pain. In experiment 2, low and high load conditions were separated in different blocks to study whether pain perception was affected when task load could be anticipated. Again, pain did not significantly affect task performance. In contrast, subjective pain intensity scores were significantly lower after performing the high load compared with the low load condition. Simultaneous recordings of event-related potentials indicated an increased negativity during the pain compared with the control condition. Also, in the early (350 to 450 msec) interval of event-related potentials, an increase in negativity was found for the high load compared with the low load condition. Topographic distributions suggested that pain and task load are mediated by qualitatively different resources. Perspective Our findings indicate that highly demanding attentional task performance and pain processing interfere as a result of difficulties in allocating attention. The clinical relevance of this finding is that performing a highly demanding task might distract attention from pain.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a well-documented history of contradiction in attention and pain research.
“Despite the many years of focused work on attention and pain, there is a well-documented history of contradiction8”
From A Contextual Analysis of Attention to Chronic Pain: What the Patient Does With Their Pain Might Be More Important Than Their Awareness or Vigilance Alone (2007) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1 · Cited by 5,902 · see citing works
Screening for Depression in Well Older Adults: Evaluation of a Short Form of the CES-D
Andresen, E. M., Malmgren, J. A., Carter, W. B., & Patrick, D. L. (1994) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(18)30622-6 · Cited by 5,403 · see citing works
A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9 · Cited by 5,055 · see citing works
Crombez, G., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., Heuts, P. H. T. G., & Lysens, R. (1999) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00229-2 · Cited by 1,662 · see citing works
Chronic pain patients are impaired on an emotional decision-making task
Apkarian, V. A., Sosa, Y., Krauss, B. R., Thomas, S. P., Fredrickson, B. E., Levy, R. E., Harden, N. R., & Chialvo, D. R. (2004) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.015 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
Disengagement from pain: the role of catastrophic thinking about pain
Van Damme, S., Crombez, G., & Eccleston, C. (2004) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2003.09.023 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Kok A: Event-related-potential (ERP) reflections of mental resources: A review and synthesis. Biol Psychol 45:19-56, 1997
- Näätänen R: Selective attention and evoked potentials in humans: A critical review. Biol Psychol 2:237-307, 1975.
- Spielberger CD: Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety In- ventory (STAI-form Y). Palo Alto, CA, Consulting Psycholo- gists Press, 1983
- Wickens CD: Processing resources in attention, in Para- suraman R, Davies DR (eds): Varieties of Attention. San Di- ego, CA: Academic Press, 1984, pp 63-102
Cited by
Sorted by citations
van Wijk, G., & Veldhuijzen, D. S. (2010) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2009.10.009 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Self-citationPerformance-dependent inhibition of pain by an executive working memory task
Buhle, J., & Wager, T. D. (2010) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.10.027 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
The Interruptive Effect of Pain on Attention
Moore, D. J., Keogh, E., & Eccleston, C. (2012) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.626865 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
McCracken, L. M. (2007) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2006.08.004 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
- Authors
- Veldhuijzen, D. S., Kenemans, J. L., de Bruin, C. M., Olivier, B., & Volkerts, E. R.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Veldhuijzen, Dieuwke S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pain
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-20
- ISSN
- 1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2100104744
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Keywords
- pain, attention, visual search, workload, attentional distraction, attentional disruption, cold pressor test, subjective pain intensity, event-related potentials, cognitive interference, attention allocation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention, Cold Temperature, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Pain Measurement, Reaction Time, Task Performance and Analysis, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review