Cited by 116Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Pain and Attention: Attentional Disruption or Distraction?

Open access
Veldhuijzen, Dieuwke S., Kenemans, J. Leon, de Bruin, C. Martine, Olivier, Berend, Volkerts, Edmund R.·2006·The Journal of Pain

Abstract

Unlabelled The effect of pain processing on attention capacity during visual search was examined in 2 experiments. In the first experiment, we investigated whether pain draws on the same limited resources as attentional task performance. It was hypothesized that pain would negatively affect task performance under different load manipulations. Low and high load conditions of a visual search task were presented in a mixed design combined with a painfully cold or neutral cold pressor test. Performance was not affected by pain. In experiment 2, low and high load conditions were separated in different blocks to study whether pain perception was affected when task load could be anticipated. Again, pain did not significantly affect task performance. In contrast, subjective pain intensity scores were significantly lower after performing the high load compared with the low load condition. Simultaneous recordings of event-related potentials indicated an increased negativity during the pain compared with the control condition. Also, in the early (350 to 450 msec) interval of event-related potentials, an increase in negativity was found for the high load compared with the low load condition. Topographic distributions suggested that pain and task load are mediated by qualitatively different resources. Perspective Our findings indicate that highly demanding attentional task performance and pain processing interfere as a result of difficulties in allocating attention. The clinical relevance of this finding is that performing a highly demanding task might distract attention from pain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.06.003

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Kok A: Event-related-potential (ERP) reflections of mental resources: A review and synthesis. Biol Psychol 45:19-56, 1997
  2. Näätänen R: Selective attention and evoked potentials in humans: A critical review. Biol Psychol 2:237-307, 1975.
  3. Spielberger CD: Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety In- ventory (STAI-form Y). Palo Alto, CA, Consulting Psycholo- gists Press, 1983
  4. Wickens CD: Processing resources in attention, in Para- suraman R, Davies DR (eds): Varieties of Attention. San Di- ego, CA: Academic Press, 1984, pp 63-102

Authors
Veldhuijzen, D. S., Kenemans, J. L., de Bruin, C. M., Olivier, B., & Volkerts, E. R.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Veldhuijzen, Dieuwke S.
Venue
The Journal of Pain
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
11-20
ISSN
1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100104744
Cited by
116
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
pain, attention, visual search, workload, attentional distraction, attentional disruption, cold pressor test, subjective pain intensity, event-related potentials, cognitive interference, attention allocation
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Cold Temperature, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Pain Measurement, Reaction Time, Task Performance and Analysis, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review