Cited by 281Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and TreatmentPain Management and Placebo Effect

Perspective on diffuse noxious inhibitory controls as a model of endogenous pain modulation in clinical pain syndromes

Open access
van Wijk, Gerrit, Veldhuijzen, Dieuwke S.·2010·The Journal of Pain

Abstract

Unlabelled Altered function of endogenous pain modulation has been proposed as a mechanism that may underlie chronic pain conditions. Descending modulation of pain can be examined by diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC). DNIC comprises a spinal-medullary-spinal pathway that is activated when 2 concomitant painful stimuli are applied at the same time. This pain-inhibitory system can be easily triggered in an experimental setting. Therefore, studies on DNIC can help us to evaluate impairments in descending pain modulation, presumably primarily of inhibitory nature. This review summarizes recent findings on human DNIC trials with a specific focus on sex, age, and ethnic differences in DNIC effects and psychological mediators such as attention, expectation, and pain catastrophizing. Furthermore, the clinical relevance of DNIC studies will be discussed. Different methodological approaches used make it difficult to generalize results, but the research to date has shown good potential for DNIC to help in gaining insights in the underlying mechanisms of chronic pain conditions.Perspective Recent literature on diffuse noxious inhibitory controls as a model of endogenous pain modulation in clinical pain syndromes was reviewed. DNIC may help to identify patients at risk for development of chronic pain and may open alternatives for treatment options.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.10.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-efficacy is a key mechanism of change in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for chronic pain.

    “self-efficacy has been shown to be a key mechanism of change in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for chronic pain 145, 315, 375.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 90 · Cited by 281

Authors
van Wijk, G., & Veldhuijzen, D. S.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Venue
The Journal of Pain
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
408-419
ISSN
1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016929710
Cited by
281
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 24
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
diffuse noxious inhibitory control, endogenous pain modulation, descending pain modulation, chronic pain, sex differences, age differences, ethnic differences, attention, expectations, pain catastrophizing
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Sex Characteristics, Sleep Wake Disorders, Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review